Vital parts of nuclear facilities are commonly protected by reinforced concrete (rc-) structures. In order to assess the barrier effectiveness of these structures, different internal and external loads have to be considered. Among others, external missile impacts, for instance due to an airplane crash, are assumed to be relevant loading cases. In this context, impacts of nondeformable (“hard”), deformable (“soft”) as well as liquid filled (“wet”) missiles are considered. Major rc-target failure mechanisms are global bending, punching and perforation. This paper presents simulations with the computer program AUTODYN (ANSYS INC., 2010, ANSYS AUTODYN, Version 13.0 & Theory Manual) on intermediate- and large-scale impact experiments dealing with the aforementioned failure mechanisms. Missile velocities are in the range of 110 to 250 m/s. In particular, two different intermediate scale test series are considered. One test deals with predominant punching failure and perforation of a rc-slab (target) hit by a hard missile. Further, bending vibration of slabs impacted by soft missiles is analyzed, whereupon the influence of liquid infill on loading and target response is pointed out. Finally, a large scaled test with combined bending and punching failure of a rc-slab due to soft missile impact is considered. Results of numerical simulation and tests are compared. It is found, that the used concret material model developed by Riedel, Hiermaier, and Thoma (RHT) (Riedel, 2004, “Beton Unter Dynamischen Lasten: Meso-Und Makromechanische Modelle Und Ihre Parameter, Fraunhofer–Ernst-Mach-Institut, Freiburg/Br., ISBN 3-8167-6340-5) is suitable to reproduce the responses of rc-structures subjected to various kinds of impact conditions. Sensitivities of simulation results on modeling parameters are discussed.

References

1.
“RSK Guidelines for Pressurized Water Reactors
,”
1996
,
Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz
, Salzgitter, Germany, 3rd ed.
2.
Li
,
Q. M.
,
Reid
,
S. R.
,
Wen
,
H. M.
, and
Telford
,
A. R.
,
2005
, “
Local Impact Effects of Hard Missiles on Concrete Targets
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
, Vol.
32
, pp.
224
284
.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.005
3.
Lastunen
,
A.
, Hakola, I., Järvinen, E., Calonius, K., and Hyvärinen, J.,
2007
, “
Impact Test Facility
,”
SMiRT
19
, Paper No. #J08/2.
4.
Hochtief
,
A. G.
,
1983
, “
Ultimate Kinetic Bearing Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Slabs
,” Paper No. RS 165 IV.
5.
Rambach
,
J.-M.
, Orbovic, N., and Tarallo, F.,
2011
, “
IRIS_2010 Part I: General Overview of the Benchmark
,”
SMiRT
21
, Paper No. #147, New Dehli.
6.
ANSYS INC.
,
2011
, “
ANSYS AUTODYN
,”
Version 13.0 & Theory Manual
.
7.
Riedel
,
W.
,
2004
, “
Beton Unter Dynamischen Lasten: Meso- Und Makromechanische Modelle Und Ihre Parameter, Fraunhofer–Ernst-Mach-Institut, Freiburg/Br., ISBN 3-8167-6340-5.
8.
Nuclear Energy Agency, 2011, “Improving Robustness Assessment Methodologies for Structures Impacted by Missiles (IRIS_2010) Final Report,” Report No. NEA/CSNI/R(2011)8
.
9.
Johnson
,
G. R.
and
Cook
,
W. H.
,
1983
, “
A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures
,”
7th Int. Symposium on Ballistics
, The Hague, The Netherlands, April 19-21.
10.
Orbovic
,
N.
, and
Blahoianu
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Tests on Concrete Slabs Under Hard Missile Impact to Evaluate the Influence of Transverse Reinforcement and Pre-stressing on Perforation Velocity
.”
SMiRT
21
, Paper No. #162, New Dehli.
11.
Riera
J. D.
,
1968
, “
On the Stress Analysis of Structures Subjected to Aircraft Impact Forces
.
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
8
, pp.
415
426
.10.1016/0029-5493(68)90039-3
12.
Heckötter
,
C.
, and
Sievers
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Simulation of an Impact Test with a Deformable Missile on a Concrete Wall
,”
SMiRT
20
, Paper No. 2502.
13.
Bowden
,
F. P.
, and Field, J. E.,
1964
, “
The Brittle Fracture of Solids by Liquid Impact, by Solid Impact and by Shock
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London A
,
282
(
1390
), pp.
331
352
.10.1098/rspa.1964.0236
You do not currently have access to this content.