A systematic approach for deriving the dynamical expression of general constrained robots is developed in this paper. This approach uses rigid-body dynamics and two kinematics-based mapping matrices to form the dynamics of complex robots in closed form. This feature enables the developed modeling approach to be rigorous in nature, since every actuator and gear-head can be separated into rigid bodies and no assumption about approximation beyond rigid-body dynamics is made. The two kinematics-based mapping matrices are used to govern the velocity and force transformations among three configuration spaces, namely, general joint space, general task space, and extended subsystems space. Consequently, the derived dynamics of general constrained robots maintain the same form and main properties as the conventional single-arm constrained robots. This approach is particularly useful for robots with hyper degrees of freedom. Five examples are given.

1.
Khatib
,
O.
, 1987, “
A Unified Approach for Motion and Force Control of Robot Manipulators: The Operational Space Formulation
,”
IEEE J. Rob. Autom.
0882-4967,
3
(
1
), pp.
43
53
.
2.
Paul
,
R. P.
, 1981,
Robot Manipulator: Mathematics, Programming, and Control
,
MIT Press
, Cambridge, MA.
3.
Fu
,
K. S.
,
Gonzalez
,
R. C.
, and
Lee
,
C. S. G.
, 1987,
Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
4.
Zhu
,
W.-H.
,
Piedboeuf
,
J.-C.
, and
Gonthier
,
Y.
, 2006, “
A Dynamics Formulation for General Constrained Robots
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
1384-5640,
16
(
1
), pp.
37
54
.
5.
Spong
,
M. W.
, 1987, “
Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Robots
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
109
, pp.
310
319
.
6.
De Luca
,
A.
, and
Manes
,
C.
, 1994, “
Modeling of Robots in Contact With a Dynamic Environment
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
10
(
3
), pp.
542
548
.
7.
Zhu
,
W.-H.
,
Xi
,
Y.-G.
,
Zhang
,
Z.-J.
,
Bien
,
Z.
, and
De Schutter
,
J.
, 1997. “
Virtual Decomposition Based Control for Generalized High Dimensional Robotic Systems With Complicated Structure
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
13
(
3
), pp.
411
436
.
8.
Jain
,
A.
, 1991, “
Unified Formulation of Dynamics for Serial Rigid Multibody Systems
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
14
(
3
), pp.
531
542
.
9.
Murphy
,
S. H.
,
Wen
,
J. T.
,
, and
Saridis
,
G. N.
, 1992, “
Simulation of Cooperating Robot Manipulators on a Mobile Platform
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
8
(
4
), pp.
468
477
.
10.
Luh
,
J. Y. S.
,
Walker
,
M. W.
, and
Paul
,
R. P. C.
, 1980, “
Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
102
(
2
), pp.
69
76
.
11.
Hollerbach
,
J. M.
, 1980, “
A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and a Comparative Study of Dynamics Formulation Complexity
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
0018-9472,
10
(
11
), pp.
730
736
.
12.
Silver
,
W. M.
, 1982, “
On the Equivalence of Lagrangian and Newton–Euler Dynamics for Manipulators
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
0278-3649,
1
(
2
), pp.
60
70
.
You do not currently have access to this content.