The discretized equations of motion for elastic systems are typically displayed in second-order form. That is, the elastic displacements are represented by a set of discretized (generalized) coordinates, such as those used in a finite-element method, and the elastic rates are simply taken to be the time-derivatives of these displacements. Unfortunately, this approach leads to unpleasant and computationally intensive inertial terms when rigid rotations of a body must be taken into account, as is so often the case in multibody dynamics. An alternative approach, presented here, assumes the elastic rates to be discretized independently of the elastic displacements. The resulting dynamical equations of motion are simplified in form, and the computational cost is correspondingly lessened. However, a slightly more complex kinematical relation between the rate coordinates and the displacement coordinates is required. This tack leads to what may be described as a discrete quasi-coordinate formulation.

1.
Kane
,
T. R.
,
Ryan
,
R. R.
, and
Banerjee
,
A. K.
, 1987, “
Dynamics of a Cantilever Beam Attached to a Moving Base
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
10
(
2
), pp.
139
151
.
2.
Hanagud
,
S.
, and
Sarkar
,
S.
, 1989, “
Problem of the Dynamics of a Cantilever Beam Attached to a Moving Base
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
12
(
3
), pp.
438
441
.
3.
Damaren
,
C. J.
, and
Sharf
,
I.
, 1995, “
Simulation of Flexible-Link Manipulators With Inertial and Geometric Nonlinearities
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
117
, pp.
74
87
.
4.
Sharf
,
I.
, 1995, “
Geometric Stiffening in Multibody Dynamics Formulations
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
18
(
4
), pp.
882
890
.
5.
White
,
M. W. D.
, and
Heppler
,
G. R.
, 1995, “
Vibration Modes and Frequencies of Timoshenko Beams With Attached Rigid Bodies
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
62
(
1
), pp.
193
199
.
6.
Oguamanam
,
D. C. D.
, and
Heppler
,
G. R.
, 1998, “
Geometric Stiffening of Timoshenko Beams
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
65
(
4
), pp.
923
929
.
7.
Sharf
,
I.
, 1999, “
Nonlinear Strain Measures, Shape Functions and Beam Elements for Dynamics of Flexible Beams
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
1384-5640,
3
, pp.
189
205
.
8.
Boltzmann
,
L.
, 1902, “
Über die Form der Lagrange’schen Gleichungen fr nichtholonome, Generalisierte Coordinaten
,”
Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften
(Wien), CXI. Band, X. Heft, pp.
1603
1614
.
9.
Hamel
,
G.
, 1904, “
Die Lagrange-Eulerschen Gleichungen der Mechanik
,”
Z. Math. Phys.
,
50
, pp.
1
57
.
10.
Papastavridis
,
J. G.
, 1994, “
On the Boltzmann-Hamel Equations of Motion: A Vectorial Treatment
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
61
(
6
), pp.
453
459
.
11.
Junkins
,
J. L.
, and
Schaub
,
H.
, 1997, “
An Instantaneous Eigenstructure Quasivelocity Formulation for Nonlinear Multibody Dynamics
,”
J. Astronaut. Sci.
0021-9142,
45
(
3
), pp.
279
295
.
12.
Hughes
,
P. C.
, 1980, “
Modal Identities for Elastic Bodies, With Application to Vehicle Dynamics and Control
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
47
, pp.
177
184
.
13.
Meirovitch
,
L.
, 1991, “
Hybrid state Equations of Motion for Flexible Bodies in Terms of Quasi-Coordinates
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
0731-5090,
14
(
5
), pp.
1008
1013
.
14.
Whittaker
,
E. T.
, 1937,
A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies
,
Cambrigde University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
You do not currently have access to this content.