The constitutive behavior of mechanical joints is largely responsible for the energy dissipation and vibration damping in built-up structures. For reasons arising from the dramatically different length scales associated with those dissipative mechanisms and the length scales characteristic of the overall structure, this physics cannot be captured through direct numerical simulation (DNS) of the contact mechanics within a structural dynamics analysis. The difficulties of DNS manifest themselves either in terms of Courant times that are orders of magnitude smaller than that necessary for structural dynamics analysis or as intractable conditioning problems. The only practical method for accommodating the nonlinear nature of joint mechanisms within structural dynamic analysis is through constitutive models employing degrees of freedom natural to the scale of structural dynamics. In this way, development of constitutive models for joint response is a prerequisite for a predictive structural dynamics capability. A four-parameter model, built on a framework developed by Iwan, is used to reproduce the qualitative and quantitative properties of lap-type joints. In the development presented here, the parameters are deduced by matching joint stiffness under low load, the force necessary to initiate macroslip, and experimental values of energy dissipation in harmonic loading. All the necessary experiments can be performed on real hardware or virtually via fine-resolution, nonlinear quasistatic finite elements. The resulting constitutive model can then be used to predict the force/displacement results from arbitrary load histories.

1.
Iwan
,
W. D.
, 1966, “
A Distributed-Element Model for Hysteresis and Its Steady-State Dynamic Response
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
33
, pp.
893
900
.
2.
Iwan
,
W. D.
, 1967, “
On a Class of Models for the Yielding Behavior of Continuous and Composite Systems
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
34
, pp.
612
617
.
3.
Levine
,
M. B.
, and
White
,
C.
, 2001, “
Microdynamic Analysis for Establishing Nanometric Stability Requirements of Jointed Precision Space Structures
,” Paper No. 325,
Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference
, Kissimmee, FL, Society of Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT.
4.
Peng
,
C.-Y.
, 1988,
Generalized Model Identification of Linear and Nonlinear Dynamic Systems
, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
5.
Jayakumar
,
P.
, 1987, “
Modeling and Identification in Structural Dynamics
,” Report No. EERL 87-01,
California Institute of Technology
, Pasadena, CA.
6.
Segalman
,
D. J.
, 2001,
An Initial Overview of Iwan Modeling for Mechanical Joints
, Report No. SAND2001-0811,
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM.
7.
Gregory
,
D. L.
,
Smallwood
,
D. O.
,
Nusser
,
M. A.
, and
Coleman
,
R. G.
, 1999, “
Experimental Device to Study the Damping in Bolted Joints
,”
Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Las Vegas, NV,
ASME, New York
.
8.
Gaul
,
L.
, and
Lenz
,
J.
, 1997, “
Nonlinear Dynamics of Structures Assembled by Bolted Joints
,”
Acta Mech.
0001-5970,
125
, pp.
169
181
.
9.
Goodman
,
L. E.
, 1959, “
A Review of Progress in Analysis of Interfacial Slip Damping
,”
Structural Damping
, papers presented at a colloquium on structural damping held at the ASME annual meeting in Atlantic City, NJ,
Jerome E.
Ruzicka
, ed.,
ASME, New York
, pp.
35
48
.
10.
Mindlin
,
R. D.
, 1949, “
Compliance of Elastic Bodies in Contact
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
16
, pp.
259
268
.
11.
Mindlin
,
R. D.
, 1952, “
Effects of an Oscillating Tangential Force on the Contact Surfaces of Elastic Spheres
,”
Proc. 1st US National Congress of Applied Mechanics
, ASME, New York, p.
203
.
12.
Abromowitz
,
M.
, and
Stegun
,
I. A.
, 1964,
Handbook of Mathematical Functions, With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables
, Dover, New York, p.
1045
.
13.
Matlab Optimization Toolbox Guide
, 2002,
The Mathworks, Inc.
, Natick, MA, p.
2.3
14.
Smallwood
,
D. O.
,
Gregory
,
D. L.
, and
Coleman
,
R. G.
, 2001, “
A Three Parameter Constitutive Model for a Joint which Exhibits a Power Law Relationship Between Energy Loss and Relative Displacement
,”
72nd Shock and Vibration Symposium
, Destin, FL, SAVIAC, Columbia, MD.
15.
Segalman
,
D. J.
, and
Starr
,
M. J.
, 2004,
Relationships Among Certain Joints Constitutive Models
, Report No. SAND2004-4321,
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque
, NM.
You do not currently have access to this content.