Predicting gear surface fatigue life is vital to gear and transmission design. Although simplified approaches based on the smooth-surface Hertzian contact stress calculations are available, the trend of compact design of high-power gear systems requires the gear design calculation to consider severe operation and lubrication conditions and detailed surface topography. It is needed, therefore, to upgrade the life prediction methods. The research presented in this paper aims to develop a gear pitting life prediction approach based on the rough-surface mixed lubrication model developed by Hu and Zhu [1] and the fatigue life model developed by Zaretsky and modified by Epstein et al [2] with accurate surface-subsurface stress analyses. With this approach, gear design parameters, operating conditions, materials, lubricant, and real tooth surface topography are used as input data. When conducting surface fatigue life prediction, three modules are employed: the mixed lubrication module, the stress analysis module, and the fatigue life module. In the mixed lubrication module, machined gear surfaces are digitized and used for calculating the pressure distribution and lubricant film thickness in the mixed lubrication. The mixed-lubrication pressure distribution is inputted into the stress module to obtain surface and subsurface von Mises stresses. These stresses are then integrated in the fatigue life module for estimating the fatigue life corresponding to a certain failure probability (50% in the present study). In other words, the life prediction is now based on subsurface von Mises stresses in the lubricated rough surface contacts, instead of smooth contact Hertzian pressure. There are a few materials constants involved in the fatigue life module. They are calibrated by comparing the prediction results with available Eaton experimental data. Table 1 lists the experimental data for 15 gear sets (most of them are hobbed and shaved) under combined rolling and sliding. The Hertzian stress ranges from 0.8554 GPa to 2.9494 GPa. It has been found that most conventional pitting life prediction methods tend to give conservative life estimates. With optimized materials parameters in the present life model, predicted pitting life results well agree with available Eaton gear test data, and the correlation appears to be 96.3%. Figure 1 shows the comparison between experimental and prediction data. Obviously, the model prediction well represents the performance of this group of gear surfaces in contact and mixed lubrication.
Skip Nav Destination
World Tribology Congress III
September 12–16, 2005
Washington, D.C., USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Tribology Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4202-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Gear Pitting Life Prediction and Comparison With Experiments Available to Purchase
Michael Bujold,
Michael Bujold
Eaton Corporation, Southfield, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
Leon M. Keer
Leon M. Keer
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Dong Zhu
Eaton Corporation, Southfield, MI
Michael Bujold
Eaton Corporation, Southfield, MI
Leon M. Keer
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Paper No:
WTC2005-63352, pp. 225-226; 2 pages
Published Online:
November 17, 2008
Citation
Zhu, D, Bujold, M, & Keer, LM. "Gear Pitting Life Prediction and Comparison With Experiments." Proceedings of the World Tribology Congress III. World Tribology Congress III, Volume 2. Washington, D.C., USA. September 12–16, 2005. pp. 225-226. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/WTC2005-63352
Download citation file:
13
Views
Related Articles
Performance of Spur Gears Considering Surface Roughness and Shear Thinning Lubricant
J. Tribol (April,2008)
Mixed Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication With Three-Dimensional Machined Roughness in Spiral Bevel and Hypoid Gears
J. Tribol (October,2015)
Analysis of Mixed Lubrication Effects in Simulated Gear Tooth Contacts
J. Tribol (January,2005)
Related Chapters
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Understanding the Problem
Design and Application of the Worm Gear
Analysis of Components in VIII-2
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition