There are two main designs used for unicompartmental tibial components. The first design, an all plastic component called an inlay, preserves bone on the outer edge of the tibia which is feasible using a robotically-controlled burring tool. Also, the depth of resection is small, preserving the strongest cancellous bone which is near the surface. The second design, called an onlay, resects the entire condyle and includes a metal backed plate which rests on the resected tibia. This component requires more bone removal but metal-backing has previously been shown to distribute the load more uniformly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that while inlay components require less bone removal, the peak stresses and strains at the surface of the bone will be greater when compared to onlay components.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference
June 22–25, 2011
Farmington, Pennsylvania, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Bioengineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5458-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparison of Interface Stresses and Strains for Onlay and Inlay Unicompartmental Tibial Components
Peter S. Walker,
Peter S. Walker
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
NYU-Poly, Brooklyn, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Dhiraj S. Parakh,
Dhiraj S. Parakh
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Miriam E. Chaudhary,
Miriam E. Chaudhary
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
NYU-Poly, Brooklyn, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Chih-Shing Wei
Chih-Shing Wei
Cooper Union for the Advancement of Arts and Science, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter S. Walker
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
NYU-Poly, Brooklyn, NY
Dhiraj S. Parakh
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
Miriam E. Chaudhary
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
NYU-Poly, Brooklyn, NY
Chih-Shing Wei
Cooper Union for the Advancement of Arts and Science, New York, NY
Paper No:
SBC2011-53199, pp. 379-380; 2 pages
Published Online:
July 17, 2013
Citation
Walker, PS, Parakh, DS, Chaudhary, ME, & Wei, C. "Comparison of Interface Stresses and Strains for Onlay and Inlay Unicompartmental Tibial Components." Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference. ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B. Farmington, Pennsylvania, USA. June 22–25, 2011. pp. 379-380. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/SBC2011-53199
Download citation file:
2
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Repair of Periprosthetic Pelvis Defects With Porous Metal Implants: A Finite Element Study
J Biomech Eng (February,2010)
A Parametric Study of Acetabular Cup Design Variables Using Finite Element Analysis and Statistical Design of Experiments
J Biomech Eng (October,1998)
Surgical Drilling: Design and Performance of an Improved Drill
J Biomech Eng (August,1982)
Related Chapters
Novel and Efficient Mathematical and Computational Methods for the Analysis and Architecting of Ultralight Cellular Materials and their Macrostructural Responses
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Introduction to Stress and Deformation
Introduction to Plastics Engineering
Start-Up, Shutdown, and Lay-Up
Consensus on Pre-Commissioning Stages for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants