It has been demonstrated that computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have the potential to enhance the comprehension of the role played by hemodynamic factors involved in atherosclerosis. Recently, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) has emerged as an effective tool for providing accurate vascular geometries for CFD simulations and quantitative data on blood flow rates, which can be used to specify realistic boundary conditions (BCs). However, the application of acquired flow waveforms at boundaries is not straightforward, mainly (i) due to possible occurrences of phase shifts and attenuations of outflow with respect to inflow rate and (ii) due to the instantaneous mass conservation constraint, which is required in hemodynamic simulations with rigid wall models, but is not guaranteed in in vivo measurements. As an alternative, new boundary conditions schemes have been developed in an effort to consider the interaction between the computational domain and the upstream/downstream vasculature by coupling through-scale hemodynamic models [1]. However, the identification of the parameters of these simplified vascular models on a subject-specific base involves both pressure and flow rates measurements [2]. In this context, it is clear that the direct application of individual PC-MRI measured flow rates waveforms as BCs in patient-specific simulations should be preferred [3]. In order to overcome the limitations mentioned above, measured flow rates should be combined with stress-free conditions or fixed mass flow ratio (derived from the same set of PC-MRI data) between inlet and multiple outlet sections. However, prescribing different BCs at boundaries can affect the solutions of the equations governing blood flow [1]. For this reason, different strategies in combining outlet BCs could lead to different simulated hemodynamics. This work analyzes the influence of different possible strategies of applying PC-MRI measured flow rates on an image-based hemodynamic model of a healthy human aortic arch with supra-aortic vessels. A total of six flow simulations was carried out applying six different schemes for treating BCs at outlets. Three common wall shear stress (WSS)-based indicators of abnormal flow were considered and the sensitivity of these indicators to the outlet treatment strategy was evaluated.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference
June 22–25, 2011
Farmington, Pennsylvania, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Bioengineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5458-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
On the Use of In Vivo Measured Flow Rates as Boundary Conditions for Image-Based Hemodynamic Models of the Human Aorta
Diego Gallo,
Diego Gallo
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Gianluca De Santis,
Gianluca De Santis
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Federica Negri,
Federica Negri
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniele Tresoldi,
Daniele Tresoldi
Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, CNR, Segrate, MI, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Giovanna Rizzo,
Giovanna Rizzo
Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, CNR, Segrate, MI, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Raffaele Ponzini,
Raffaele Ponzini
CILEA InterUniversity Consortium, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Diana Massai,
Diana Massai
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Marco Deriu,
Marco Deriu
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Marcello Cadioli,
Marcello Cadioli
Philips Medical Systems, MI, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Benedict Verhegghe,
Benedict Verhegghe
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick Segers,
Patrick Segers
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Alberto Redaelli,
Alberto Redaelli
Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Umberto Morbiducci
Umberto Morbiducci
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Diego Gallo
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Gianluca De Santis
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Federica Negri
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Daniele Tresoldi
Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, CNR, Segrate, MI, Italy
Giovanna Rizzo
Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, CNR, Segrate, MI, Italy
Raffaele Ponzini
CILEA InterUniversity Consortium, Italy
Diana Massai
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Marco Deriu
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Marcello Cadioli
Philips Medical Systems, MI, Italy
Benedict Verhegghe
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Patrick Segers
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Alberto Redaelli
Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Umberto Morbiducci
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Paper No:
SBC2011-53232, pp. 15-16; 2 pages
Published Online:
July 17, 2013
Citation
Gallo, D, De Santis, G, Negri, F, Tresoldi, D, Rizzo, G, Ponzini, R, Massai, D, Deriu, M, Cadioli, M, Verhegghe, B, Segers, P, Redaelli, A, & Morbiducci, U. "On the Use of In Vivo Measured Flow Rates as Boundary Conditions for Image-Based Hemodynamic Models of the Human Aorta." Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference. ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B. Farmington, Pennsylvania, USA. June 22–25, 2011. pp. 15-16. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/SBC2011-53232
Download citation file:
12
Views
Related Articles
Unsteady and Three-Dimensional Simulation of Blood Flow in the Human
Aortic Arch
J Biomech Eng (August,2002)
The Impact of Simplified Boundary Conditions and Aortic Arch Inclusion on CFD Simulations in the Mouse Aorta: A Comparison With Mouse-specific Reference Data
J Biomech Eng (December,2011)
Simulating Subject-Specific Aortic Hemodynamic Effects of Valvular Lesions in Rheumatic Heart Disease
J Biomech Eng (November,2023)
Related Chapters
Introduction
Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and Radial-Flow Turbine Design and Analysis
CFD Simulations of a Mixed-flow Pump Using Various Turbulence Models
Mixed-flow Pumps: Modeling, Simulation, and Measurements
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition