Advanced prostheses are currently being sold in consumer markets. The development of these advanced prostheses is largely a result of a better understanding of the biomechanics of human locomotion . Powered and microprocessor controlled prostheses are offering better performance in a variety of movements and in the gait cycle. However the focus in lower limb prosthetics has been largely on locomotion (e.g. walking, stair gait and running). This study focuses on the sit and stand cycles of an individual with an Otto Bock C-leg and an Ossur Power Knee prosthesis, comparing his ability to utilize each prosthesis and comparing his cycle to that of a healthy (non-amputee) control subject. This study is part of a larger ongoing study of the sit and stand cycles seen in a large population of unilateral transfemoral prosthetic users of various kinds. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in method of standing, and assistance provided by the prosthesis. With the knowledge gained from this study we hope to better understand the biomechanics of the sit and stand cycles, leading to better prostheses in the future.
- Bioengineering Division
Kinetic Differences in a Subject With Two Different Prosthetic Knees While Performing Sitting and Standing Movements
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Lura, DJ, Highsmith, MJ, Carey, SL, & Dubey, RV. "Kinetic Differences in a Subject With Two Different Prosthetic Knees While Performing Sitting and Standing Movements." Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference. ASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B. Marco Island, Florida, USA. June 25–29, 2008. pp. 597-598. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/SBC2008-193045
Download citation file: