It has been held as axiomatic, almost since the inception of rail vehicles, that high speed operations demand the implementation of two-stage suspension in truck design. This paper presents factors which refute that idea. Through the analysis of both types of suspension — statically and dynamically — it is shown that the benefits that are thought to be attributable to two-stage suspensions are not confirmed by the facts. Design considerations for both single-stage and two-stage suspensions are also examined, and the non-performance issues are evaluated. It is concluded that there is no reason, from a high speed or safety performance standpoint, to implement a two-stage suspension, but that some practical — especially manufacturing — issues can dictate the use of it in certain applications. For many, if not most, applications, however, a single-stage suspension is the most desirable design choice.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2010 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference
October 12–13, 2010
Roanoke, Virginia, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Rail Transportation Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4406-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
The Cases for and Against Primary Suspension in Truck Design Available to Purchase
Roy E. Smith
Roy E. Smith
RESCO Engineering, Kingston, ON, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Roy E. Smith
RESCO Engineering, Kingston, ON, Canada
Paper No:
RTDF2010-42005, pp. 17-30; 14 pages
Published Online:
April 6, 2011
Citation
Smith, RE. "The Cases for and Against Primary Suspension in Truck Design." Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference. ASME 2010 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference. Roanoke, Virginia, USA. October 12–13, 2010. pp. 17-30. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/RTDF2010-42005
Download citation file:
9
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Magnetic Guidance of Conventional Railroad Vehicles
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,1982)
Lateral Dynamics Optimization of a Conventional Railcar
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,1975)
The Design of Motor-Truck Engines for Long Life
Trans. ASME (January,1917)
Related Chapters
Evaluation of the Safety in the Rail Vehicles Traffic Using Statistical Methods (PSAM-0469)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Dismantling
Decommissioning Handbook
Identification and Analysis of Risk
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects