The distinction between a ratcheting and non-ratcheting response is critical for many high temperature design methods. Non-ratcheting is generally considered safe — deformation remain bounded over the lifetime of the component — while ratcheting is undesirable. As a particular example, the elastic perfectly-plastic (EPP) design methods described in recent ASME Section III, Division 5 code cases require a designer to distinguish ratcheting from non-ratcheting for finite element analyses using a relatively simple, elastic perfectly-plastic constitutive response. However, it can be quite difficult to distinguish these two deformation regimes using finite element (FE) analysis particularly in the case where the actual ratcheting strain is small. In practice FE analysis of structures that are analytically in either the plastic shakedown or ratcheting regimes will result in small, cycle-to-cycle accumulated strains characteristic of ratcheting. Distinguishing false ratcheting — the structure is actually in the plastic shakedown regime — from true ratcheting can be challenging. We describe the characteristics of nonlinear FE analysis that cause these false ratcheting strains and describe practical methods for distinguishing a ratcheting from a non-ratcheting response.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
July 15–20, 2018
Prague, Czech Republic
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5159-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Detection of Ratcheting in Finite Element Calculations
M. C. Messner,
M. C. Messner
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
T.-L. Sham
T.-L. Sham
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
M. C. Messner
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
T.-L. Sham
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL
Paper No:
PVP2018-84102, V01BT01A013; 9 pages
Published Online:
October 26, 2018
Citation
Messner, MC, & Sham, T. "Detection of Ratcheting in Finite Element Calculations." Proceedings of the ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Volume 1B: Codes and Standards. Prague, Czech Republic. July 15–20, 2018. V01BT01A013. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84102
Download citation file:
50
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Design and Verification of a Sensing Device for Deformation Measurement of High Temperature Pipes
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2011)
Comparison of Deformable and Elastic Foundation Finite Element Simulations for Predicting Knee Replacement Mechanics
J Biomech Eng (October,2005)
Related Chapters
Subsection NB—Class 1 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition
Piping Design
Power Boilers: A Guide to the Section I of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Second Edition
Cyclic Deformation and Failure of Polymers
Cyclic Stress-Strain Behavior—Analysis, Experimentation, and Failure Prediction