Elastic and plastic load line displacement (LLD) rates are often ignored when analyzing Creep Crack Growth (CCG) tests due to difficulties in accurately determining their value for complex crack morphologies typical of creep. Instead, the total LLD rate is assumed to be entirely due to creep. This simplistic approach overestimates the crack tip characterizing parameter C* which is non-conservative.

This paper presents a review of the current method of interpreting CCG test data in ASTM E1457 and proposes an improved approach which accounts for the elastic and plastic LLD rates. Estimations of the elastic and plastic LLD rate are obtained from a partial unload immediately after load-up and a full unload, at the end of the test, prior to final failure. Some finite element validation of this method is presented. Implementing this approach will facilitate more realistic CCG laws.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.