This report addresses a mixed mode driven cracking and its fracture failure assessment for applications in aging nuclear power facilities. Following our earlier discussion on the use of mode-I based criteria in the current practice of fracture assessments, a finite element analysis of a full-scale laboratory test, a Benchmark four-point bending test of a straight pipe with an obliquely inserted crack in a dissimilar metal weld of ferritic steel (A508) and austenitic steel (316L), together with weld (308L) and buttering material (309L/308L), is conducted. The behavior of the crack front at the load level, at which crack initiation is observed in the test, such as stress intensities (KI, KII, KIII), J-integrals and other relevant parameters along the crack front, are computed. Crack initiation assessments are thereafter made using three alternatives: (1) Mode I cracking; (2) Mixed mode cracking; (3) An empirical approach suggested for accounting the mixed mode effect using a so-called R6-method. The results confirm our earlier observation: For cases when mixed mode loading conditions are significant, (i) the fracture initiation predicted by using J-integral based mixed mode cracking criteria can approximately be achieved by using the R6-empirical approach for the mixed mode cracking; (ii) it is not conservative to use a purely mode-I based criterion for the evaluation of the fracture failure assessment for typical problems of mixed mode driven cracking.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.