Ductile fracture propagation control is one of the most important technologies adopted in engineering design for high-pressure, high-strength gas transmission pipelines. In the early 1970s, Battelle Memorial Institute developed a two-curve model that is now commonly referred to as BTCM for dynamic ductile fracture control analysis. The BTCM has been applied successfully for determining the minimum fracture toughness required to arrest a running ductile fracture in a gas transmission pipeline in terms of Charpy vee-notched (CVN) impact energy. Practice showed that BTCM is accurate only for pipeline grades up to X65, and becomes invalid for high strength pipeline steels like X70, X80 and X100. Since 1990s, different correction methods for improving the BTCM have been proposed. However, a commonly accepted method is not available yet for the high strength pipeline steels in grades X80 and above. This paper reviews and evaluates the primary existing methods in determination of fracture arrest toughness for ductile pipeline steels. These include the CVN energy-based methods, the drop-weight tear test (DWTT) energy-based methods, the crack-tip opening angle (CTOA) method, and finite element numerical analysis methods. The purpose is to identify a method to be used in engineering design or to be investigated further for determining the minimum fracture toughness to arrest a ductile running crack in a modern high-pressure, high-strength gas pipeline.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.