This study aims to evaluate the relevance of the active plasticity hypothesis in predicting the risk of cleavage fracture during a WPS loading cycle. We define a critical loading path, along which the active plasticity hypothesis might fail. On this critical loading path, Beremin local model is compared to a stress-based criterion model. The chosen critical loading path is a LTF (Load-Transient-Fracture) cycle, including an isothermal preloading up to F1WPS = 42 kN at TWPS = −25°C followed by a cooling down to TFRAC = −150°C with a progressive loading up to F2WPS = 45 kN before an isothermal reloading up to fracture at −150°C. The final loading level (F2WPS = 45 kN) is chosen so that the plasticity is not active during the cooling phase while the stress-based criterion is. Two sets of experiments, performed on normalized compact tensile specimens made of 16MND5 steel, have demonstrated that the active plasticity was a necessary condition for cleavage fracture.
- Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
Evaluation of the Active Plasticity Hypothesis as a Relevant Justification of the Warm Pre-Stressing Effect
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Jacquemoud, C, Marie, S, & Nedelec, M. "Evaluation of the Active Plasticity Hypothesis as a Relevant Justification of the Warm Pre-Stressing Effect." Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Volume 6: Materials and Fabrication, Parts A and B. Baltimore, Maryland, USA. July 17–21, 2011. pp. 265-272. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2011-57190
Download citation file: