In the 1970’s and early 80’s there was a reevaluation of the role of inservice inspection programs. Inservice inspection programs as originally developed under the ASME Section XI Code requirements were based on the best information available at the time and helped establish the safety of the subject components. However, it was determined that the examination requirements were not efficient because examinations were being focused on many welds, components, and systems that are not as important as originally thought when the ASME Section III Classes 1, 2, and 3 categories were developed. It was determined that the appropriate locations were not being inspected and that the most effective types of examinations were not being performed. It was felt that a more optimal inspection approach was needed. This eventually led to the development of the risk-informed inservice inspection (RI-ISI) methodology. RI-ISI provides a structured and systematic framework for allocating inspection resources in a cost-effective manner while improving plant safety. It helps focus inspections where failure mechanisms are likely to be and where enhanced inspections are warranted. This paper examines the foundations for the current RI-ISI initiatives and how the RI-ISI methodology may be used in the future for current and next generation plants.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference
July 18–22, 2010
Bellevue, Washington, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-49255
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparative Review of Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection Methodologies
Alan D. Chockie,
Alan D. Chockie
Chockie Group International, Inc., Seattle, WA
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Robin Graybeal,
M. Robin Graybeal
Inservice Engineering, Pawleys Island, SC
Search for other works by this author on:
Scott D. Kulat
Scott D. Kulat
Inservice Engineering, Downers Grove, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Alan D. Chockie
Chockie Group International, Inc., Seattle, WA
M. Robin Graybeal
Inservice Engineering, Pawleys Island, SC
Scott D. Kulat
Inservice Engineering, Downers Grove, IL
Paper No:
PVP2010-25737, pp. 1139-1149; 11 pages
Published Online:
January 10, 2011
Citation
Chockie, AD, Graybeal, MR, & Kulat, SD. "Comparative Review of Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection Methodologies." Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference. ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 6, Parts A and B. Bellevue, Washington, USA. July 18–22, 2010. pp. 1139-1149. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2010-25737
Download citation file:
9
Views
Related Articles
Overview of the Impact of Ultrasonic Examination Performance Demonstration on the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2002)
Evolution of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2000)
Containment Inservice Inspection, Repair, Replacement, and Testing
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2000)
Related Chapters
Iwe and Iwl
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition
IWE and IWL
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Second Edition: Criteria and Commentary on Select Aspects of the Boiler & Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes
Activities of the European Network for Inspection and Qualification Towards a Harmonized European Approach to RI-ISI (PSAM-0235)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)