There exist some atypical loads on pressure vessels during transportation. This is particularly true when the pressure vessel weighs over 500 tonnes. In this example vessel, the transportation was via rail on a “Schnabel Car”, in which the vessel is suspended horizontally between the top nozzle and the skirt, and a significant axial compressive load is applied. During the evaluation of the stresses in the top head, a particularly novel situation was encountered which brought about some interesting issues with regards to the three Design-By-Analysis methods: Elastic, Limit Load, and Elastic-Plastic. This paper discusses the comparison between all three of these Design-By-Analysis methods, and provides recommendations for which is most appropriate for this type of evaluation. Additional recommendations and warnings are provided for the use of the Elastic and Limit Load methods as well.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference
July 18–22, 2010
Bellevue, Washington, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4922-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Novel Comparison of Design-by-Analysis Methods Available to Purchase
Mark Stonehouse,
Mark Stonehouse
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Trevor G. Seipp,
Trevor G. Seipp
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Shinichiro Kanamaru,
Shinichiro Kanamaru
JGC Corporation, Yokohama, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Shawn Morrison
Shawn Morrison
M5 Engineering, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Stonehouse
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Trevor G. Seipp
Becht Engineering Canada, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Shinichiro Kanamaru
JGC Corporation, Yokohama, Japan
Shawn Morrison
M5 Engineering, Calgary, AB, Canada
Paper No:
PVP2010-26128, pp. 423-427; 5 pages
Published Online:
January 10, 2011
Citation
Stonehouse, M, Seipp, TG, Kanamaru, S, & Morrison, S. "A Novel Comparison of Design-by-Analysis Methods." Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference. ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 3. Bellevue, Washington, USA. July 18–22, 2010. pp. 423-427. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2010-26128
Download citation file:
20
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Engineering Hydrogen Storage Systems
ENIC2007
Related Articles
Hydraulic Circuit Design Rules to Remove the Dependence of the Injected Fuel Amount on Dwell Time in Multijet CR Systems
J. Fluids Eng (December,2008)
Parametric FEA Study of Burst Pressure of Cylindrical Shell Intersections
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2010)
An Analytical Method for Cylindrical Shells With Nozzles Due to Internal Pressure and External Loads—Part II: Design Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2010)
Related Chapters
Development of Nuclear Boiler and Pressure Vessels in Taiwan
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 3, Third Edition
Subsection NCA—General Requirements for Division 1 and Division 2
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition
Subsection NCA—General Requirements for Division 1 and Division 2
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition