A key input to calculation of the structural integrity of the RPV by the brittle fracture criterion is known to be the fracture toughness of a material. When calculating resistance of RPV to brittle fracture it was taken earlier that fracture toughness, KJC, depends only on temperature, and does not depend on thickness of specimens if this thickness is sufficiently large so that the plane strain condition is satisfied. To date it has become clear by many researches that KJC depends on a crack front length. This follows from the statistical nature of brittle fracture in steels. It means that for adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity, the dependence of KJC on the postulated flaw size has to be taken into account. Moreover, it has been shown that the KJC values for specimens with shallow cracks are larger than for specimens with deep cracks, and the KJC values obtained from small-size fracture toughness specimens (for example, pre-cracked Charpy specimens) are larger than the values for CT specimens with thickness of 25 mm, and KJC values may be affected load biaxiality. These findings are explained by the loss of constraint. Thus, for adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity by the brittle fracture criterion, the scale factor has to be taken into account, with two causes being responsible: the physical cause connected with the statistical nature of brittle fracture and the mechanical one related to the difference in constraint for specimens of various geometries. This analysis is important for assessment of RPV structural integrity because i) for most cases the postulated flaws in RPV, due to their size and location, may be considered as shallow cracks; ii) the KJC values for irradiated RPV steels are usually obtained from small-size surveillance specimens that are as a rule, pre-cracked Charpy specimens; iii) for a postulated flaw in RPV, a load acts both perpendicular and along a crack front. i.e. loading is biaxial. For adequate assessment of RPV structural integrity by the brittle fracture criterion it is also necessary to take into account that distribution of the stress intensity factor along a crack front in RPV is heterogeneous, and loading is non-monotonic and non-isothermal. In the present report, advanced approaches are considered for assessment of RPV structural integrity that allow solving the above problems. The considered approaches have been included in Russian Standards for assessment of RPV structural integrity.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
July 26–30, 2009
Prague, Czech Republic
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4369-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Structural Integrity Assessment of RPV With Brittle Fracture Criterion: Issues and Advanced Approaches
George Karzov,
George Karzov
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Boris Margolin,
Boris Margolin
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Victoria Shvetsova,
Victoria Shvetsova
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Victor Kostylev
Victor Kostylev
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
George Karzov
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Boris Margolin
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Victoria Shvetsova
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Victor Kostylev
Central Research Institute of Structural Materials “Prometey”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Paper No:
PVP2009-77085, pp. 37-50; 14 pages
Published Online:
July 9, 2010
Citation
Karzov, G, Margolin, B, Shvetsova, V, & Kostylev, V. "Structural Integrity Assessment of RPV With Brittle Fracture Criterion: Issues and Advanced Approaches." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Volume 6: Materials and Fabrication, Parts A and B. Prague, Czech Republic. July 26–30, 2009. pp. 37-50. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2009-77085
Download citation file:
14
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Prediction of Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Under Different Strain Rates in Undermatched Welded Joints
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2011)
Crack Arrest Toughness of a Heat-Affected Zone Containing Local
Brittle Zones
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (November,1996)
Related Chapters
Recent Developments in J Ic Testing
Developments in Fracture Mechanics Test Methods Standardization
Investigation of Some Problems In Developing Standards for Precracked Charpy Slow Bend Tests
Developments in Fracture Mechanics Test Methods Standardization
Estimation of K Ic from Slow Bend Precracked Charpy Specimen Strength Ratios
Developments in Fracture Mechanics Test Methods Standardization