This paper provides a comparison of the influence of specimen type (single edge bend (SE(B)) specimen vs. compact tension C(T) specimen), specimen dimensions (crack length ratio a/W, thickness B) and the effect of the loading rate on fracture toughness properties. In the lower ductile-brittle transition region the quasi-static Master Curve (MC) reference temperature T0 is evaluated according to ASTM E 1921-08ae1 and the dynamic MC T0 according to the Swiss guideline HSK-AN-425, which is compared with a modified ASTM E 1921-08ae1 approach. The ductile behaviour was evaluated by quasi-static JR curve testing in which the applicability of several evaluation standards are compared (ASTM E 1820-08, ISO 12135, ESIS-P2). Quasi-static and dynamic MC temperatures T0 deviate by up to 68 K. SE(B) specimens with shorter crack lengths (a/W = 0.3) than prescribed by ASTM E 1921 yield the same T0 as specimens with a/W = 0.5. Thus, such short crack surveillance specimens are also suitable for fracture mechanical assessments. SE(B) specimens of B = 0.4T (1T = 1 inch) up to 3.2T show comparable T0, proving the transferability of fracture mechanical test results of small surveillance specimens to heavy-walled RPV structures.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
July 26–30, 2009
Prague, Czech Republic
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4368-0
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Influence of Specimen Type, Crack Length and Evaluation Method on Quasi-Static and Dynamic Fracture Toughness Properties
Conrad Zurbuchen
Conrad Zurbuchen
Research Centre Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., Dresden, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Conrad Zurbuchen
Research Centre Dresden-Rossendorf e.V., Dresden, Germany
Paper No:
PVP2009-77796, pp. 511-517; 7 pages
Published Online:
July 9, 2010
Citation
Zurbuchen, C. "Influence of Specimen Type, Crack Length and Evaluation Method on Quasi-Static and Dynamic Fracture Toughness Properties." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Volume 5: High Pressure Technology; Nondestructive Evaluation Division; Student Paper Competition. Prague, Czech Republic. July 26–30, 2009. pp. 511-517. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2009-77796
Download citation file:
10
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Reactor Surveillance Test and Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of Irradiation Embrittlement in Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (October,1980)
Erratum: “Plane-Strain Propagation of a Fluid-Driven Fracture: Small Toughness Solution” [ Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2005, 72(6), pp. 916–928 ]
J. Appl. Mech (July,2007)
A Technique to Measure Interfacial Toughness Over a Range of Phase Angles
J. Electron. Packag (June,2000)
Related Chapters
Applications of Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics in Section XI, ASME Code Evaluations
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes
A Fracture Mechanics Method for an Advanced Evaluation of Inclusions and the Prediction of Fatigue Life of Rolling Element Bearings
Bearing and Transmission Steels Technology
A Combined Statistical and Constraint Model for the Ductile-Brittle Transition Region
Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics: Volume II Elastic-Plastic Fracture