When designing branch connections in low pressure large diameter piping systems as in Figure 1, thicker is not always better. The flexibility factors in ASME B31.3 1 for branch connections do not assist the designer in taking credit for flexibility that may exist in a large diameter intersection. Since the stress intensification factors (SIFs) are relatively high for large diameter piping, many stub-in branch connections will require a pad to meet the code displacement stress limits. In an ASME B31.3 Piping analysis the stiffness of the branch connections is considered to be as stiff as a straight piece of pipe modeled as a beam. This is a simplifying assumption that can lead to expensive conservatism for the component and possibly non-conservatism for nearby equipment especially when large diameter pipe is considered. Branch connection flexibility is often negligible when compared with piping flexibility of straight pipe perpendicular to the deflection and bends which can ovalize under in-plane bending moments. However, studies at KBR show branch connections in large diameter pipe can contribute significant flexibility to a close coupled piping system.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME/JSME 2004 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
July 25–29, 2004
San Diego, California, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4672-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Reduction in Stresses Shown in Piping Programs in Large Diameter Pipe Branch Connections by Applying Flexibilities Computed by Shell Finite Element Analysis
Robert A. Robleto
Robert A. Robleto
KBR, Houston, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert A. Robleto
KBR, Houston, TX
Paper No:
PVP2004-2596, pp. 55-59; 5 pages
Published Online:
August 12, 2008
Citation
Robleto, RA. "Reduction in Stresses Shown in Piping Programs in Large Diameter Pipe Branch Connections by Applying Flexibilities Computed by Shell Finite Element Analysis." Proceedings of the ASME/JSME 2004 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Design and Analysis of Pressure Vessels, Heat Exchangers and Piping Components. San Diego, California, USA. July 25–29, 2004. pp. 55-59. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2004-2596
Download citation file:
13
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Integrity Assessment of Pressure Components With Local Hot Spots
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,2005)
The Unified Theory of Tubesheet Design—Part I: Theoretical Foundation
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2022)
The Unified Theory of Tubesheet Design—Part II: Supplement to the Theoretical Analysis
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2022)
Related Chapters
Nonmetallic Pressure Piping System Components Part A: Experience With Nonmetallic Materials in Structural/Pressure Boundary Applications
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes
Piping Design
Power Boilers: A Guide to the Section I of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Second Edition
Nonmetallic Pressure Piping System Components 1 Part A: Experience With Nonmetallic Materials in Structural/Pressure Boundary Applications
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1, Fifth Edition