Uncertainty in modeling the creep rupture life of a full-scale component using experimental data at microscopic (Level 1), specimen (Level 2), and full-size (Level 3) scales, is addressed by applying statistical theory of prediction intervals, and that of tolerance intervals based on the concept of coverage, p. Using a nonlinear least squares fit algorithm and the physical assumption that the one-sided Lower Tolerance Limit ( LTL ), at 95 % confidence level, of the creep rupture life, i.e., the minimum time-to-failure, minTf, of a full-scale component, cannot be negative as the lack or “Failure” of coverage ( Fp ), defined as 1 - p, approaches zero, we develop a new creep rupture life model, where the minimum time-to-failure, minTf, at extremely low “Failure” of coverage, Fp, can be estimated. Since the concept of coverage is closely related to that of an inspection strategy, and if one assumes that the predominent cause of failure of a full-size component is due to the “Failure” of inspection or coverage, it is reasonable to equate the quantity, Fp, to a Failure Probability, FP, thereby leading to a new approach of estimating the frequency of in-service inspection of a full-size component. To illustrate this approach, we include a numerical example using the published creep rupture time data of an API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 Grade 91 steel at 571.1 C (1060 F) (API-STD-530, 2007), and a linear least squares fit to generate the necessary uncertainties for ultimately performing a dynamic risk analysis, where a graphical plot of an estimate of risk with uncertainty vs. a predicted most likely date of a high consequence failure event due to creep rupture becomes available for a risk-informed inspection strategy associated with an energy-generation or chemical processing plant equipment.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2018 Symposium on Elevated Temperature Application of Materials for Fossil, Nuclear, and Petrochemical Industries
April 3–5, 2018
Seattle, Washington, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- ASME Standards and Certification
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4076-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Uncertainty in Multi-Scale Creep Rupture Life Modeling and a New Approach to Estimating Frequency of In-Service Inspection of Components at Elevated Temperatures
Jeffrey T. Fong,
Jeffrey T. Fong
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Alan Heckert,
N. Alan Heckert
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Search for other works by this author on:
James J. Filliben,
James J. Filliben
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Search for other works by this author on:
Marvin J. Cohn
Marvin J. Cohn
Intertek, AIM, Santa Clara, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey T. Fong
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
N. Alan Heckert
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
James J. Filliben
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Marvin J. Cohn
Intertek, AIM, Santa Clara, CA
Paper No:
ETAM2018-6711, V001T04A002; 11 pages
Published Online:
May 8, 2018
Citation
Fong, JT, Heckert, NA, Filliben, JJ, & Cohn, MJ. "Uncertainty in Multi-Scale Creep Rupture Life Modeling and a New Approach to Estimating Frequency of In-Service Inspection of Components at Elevated Temperatures." Proceedings of the ASME 2018 Symposium on Elevated Temperature Application of Materials for Fossil, Nuclear, and Petrochemical Industries. ASME 2018 Symposium on Elevated Temperature Application of Materials for Fossil, Nuclear, and Petrochemical Industries. Seattle, Washington, USA. April 3–5, 2018. V001T04A002. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/ETAM2018-6711
Download citation file:
416
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Application of an Enhanced RBI Method for Petrochemical Equipments
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2006)
Case Study of the Use of API 581 on HK and HP Material Furnace Tubes
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2005)
A Recent Review of Risk-Based Inspection Development to Support Service Excellence in the Oil and Gas Industry: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2023)
Related Chapters
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Use of PSA in Lisencing of EPR 1600 in Finland (PSAM-0160)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)