Combustion turbine combined cycle (CTCC) plants have generally been the “power plant of choice” over the past two decades for a number of reasons, including first cost, efficiency, and low emissions. Combustion (Gas) turbine (CT) based plants now account for over 30% of the electric power capacity in the United States. Despite the significant reliance on this technology, the electric Independent System Operators (ISOs) have yet to recognize and acknowledge in their production templates, test forms and performance predicting software the Brayton Cycle limitations, most notably how humidity affects output for CT plants equipped with evaporative cooling systems. Such plants account for an estimated 48% of the CT power installed in the last 10 years. Ignoring the impact of humidity on these plants can lead to errors in production predictions beyond the normal tolerance band of 3% to as high as 9% during peak ambient temperatures for certain units. As such the electric ISO’s prediction of available generation and the associated capacity reserve margins have the potential to be overestimated. The article explores the situation in more depth, presents examples within the NYISO, quantifies the potential impact and recommends easy solutions to close the gap.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2010 Power Conference
July 13–15, 2010
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Power Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4935-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Errors Resulting From Excluding the Effects of Humidity on the Performance of Combustion Turbine Plants Equipped With Evaporative Coolers
John Sasso
John Sasso
Sigma Energy Solutions, Inc., Melville, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
John Sasso
Sigma Energy Solutions, Inc., Melville, NY
Paper No:
POWER2010-27057, pp. 843-845; 3 pages
Published Online:
December 24, 2010
Citation
Sasso, J. "Errors Resulting From Excluding the Effects of Humidity on the Performance of Combustion Turbine Plants Equipped With Evaporative Coolers." Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Power Conference. ASME 2010 Power Conference. Chicago, Illinois, USA. July 13–15, 2010. pp. 843-845. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/POWER2010-27057
Download citation file:
10
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Dry Air Turbo-Compression Cooling
POWER2016
Related Articles
Beyond Brayton Cycle: It is Time to Change the Paradigm
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (November,2018)
Advanced Coal-Fired Power Plants
J. Energy Resour. Technol (March,2001)
Analysis of Gas-Steam Combined Cycles With Natural Gas Reforming and CO 2 Capture
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2005)
Related Chapters
Combined Cycle Power Plant
Energy and Power Generation Handbook: Established and Emerging Technologies
Threshold Functions
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Introduction
Consensus on Operating Practices for Control of Water and Steam Chemistry in Combined Cycle and Cogeneration