Successful cogeneration system design requires a combination of engineering, investigation, and forecasting skills. Operating schedules for the facility must be considered in the design of the cogeneration system to optimize overall plant utilization and economics. This results in tradeoffs between electrical power production and thermal heat recovery for many applications of the technology. Optimizing these two parameters requires a thorough understanding of how and when the facility uses power and heat and the owner’s objectives of the investment in the cogeneration system. Customer-sited cogeneration systems have been accepted as one option to mitigate electrical supply shortages. On the utility side, this requires that cogeneration systems operate at a relatively high capacity factor, especially during peak periods. On the customer side, the cogeneration system must be capable of meeting onsite energy needs to reduce energy costs. In California, the Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) provides incentives for the installation of distributed generation systems. Incentives are paid on an installed capacity basis ($/kW) that varies by installed technology. Eligible technologies include photovoltaic, wind, fuel cells, internal combustion engines, and microturbines. Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc. (AESC) provides technical support services to the SGIP, the sponsoring utilities and SGIP’s Working Group. The services that AESC provides varies with utility, but primarily includes program design support, regulatory review, technology evaluation, application review, generator performance metering, participant training and equipment field verification. Itron evaluates the SGIP to quantify performance of the systems and estimate overall impacts of the program. This paper will present best practice recommendations for cogeneration system design to meet the efficiency criteria of the SGIP. Recommendations are based on findings from numerous AESC performance reviews and on-site inspections, as well as results of Itron’s in-depth performance evaluation of the effectiveness of useful thermal energy recovery of on-site cogeneration systems receiving incentives from the SGIP. Information is presented through Program Year 2005. Results of several past studies have suggested that cogeneration systems were not operating as they were designed and, more importantly, were not achieving the efficiencies claimed at the design stage. This paper will also explore some of the key drivers behind the unexpectedly low thermal energy recovery and overall plant performance sampled from the fleet of SGIP cogenerators. Results from recent Itron studies will be combined with AESC’s expertise in actual operations to develop a list of best practices to be followed when designing and commissioning a cogeneration system.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2007 Power Conference
July 17–19, 2007
San Antonio, Texas, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Power Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4273-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Best Practices for Cogeneration System Design
Pierre Landry
Pierre Landry
Southern California Edison, Rosemead, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Brad Souza
Itron, Inc., San Diego, CA
Ron Ishii
AESC, Inc., Carlsbad, CA
George Simons
Itron, Inc., Vancouver, WA
Pierre Landry
Southern California Edison, Rosemead, CA
Paper No:
POWER2007-22113, pp. 29-37; 9 pages
Published Online:
April 21, 2009
Citation
Souza, B, Ishii, R, Simons, G, & Landry, P. "Best Practices for Cogeneration System Design." Proceedings of the ASME 2007 Power Conference. ASME 2007 Power Conference. San Antonio, Texas, USA. July 17–19, 2007. pp. 29-37. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/POWER2007-22113
Download citation file:
8
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
The Quest for More Efficient Industrial Engines: A Review of Current Industrial Engine Development and Applications
J. Energy Resour. Technol (June,2009)
Energy Analysis of a Residential Combined Heat and Power System Based on a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol (February,2009)
Distributed Generation (DG) and the American Electric Utility System:
What is Stopping It?
J. Energy Resour. Technol (March,2008)
Related Chapters
Risk Mitigation for Renewable and Deispersed Generation by the Harmonized Grouping (PSAM-0310)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Development of Nuclear Boiler and Pressure Vessels in Taiwan
Global Applications of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code
A Utility Perspective of Wind Energy
Wind Turbine Technology: Fundamental Concepts in Wind Turbine Engineering, Second Edition