This paper presents an approach that has not previously been applied to predict power plant component fatigue failure. While many computer tools and procedures do exist for life prediction, recent experience shows that those methods often lack needed precision. In addition detailed knowledge of the material fracture mechanics properties and of the component load history, including the sequence of events. For complex load applications the sequence of events has been shown to be significant. For these applications Linear Damage Models (Minors Rule) are inadequate. A case where the accuracy of existing methods was found to be insufficient involved a steam power plant. Fatigue cracks were observed in the blade root area of 10% of the L-0 row turbine blades. The cracked blades were removed and replaced with new blades. The question to be answered was how safe are the reinstalled blades that had no visible damage. A successful solution was obtained by integrating NASA technology with STI experience in the analysis of steam and gas turbine blades. This led to the development of a proprietary, advanced life prediction computer code that: • incorporates contributions from both HCF and LCF to calculate crack growth, • treats the actual sequence in which all HCF and LCF loading has been applied, and • initiates the crack growth process from the microscopic inclusions and flaws. Complete analysis included comprehensive material tests, performed at a qualified material-testing laboratory. Test specimens were created from actual components, which had been subjected to over 30 years of service. Realizing that fatigue testing data variations can be relatively large, results from Life Cycle showed solid agreement with both short-term (105 to 106 cycles) material tests and with long-term (∼160×109 cycles) operation under high strain steady load and low strain cyclic load conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Sign In or Register for Account
ASME 2004 Power Conference
March 30–April 1, 2004
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Power Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4162-6
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Turbine Blade Fatigue Crack Growth
Ronald N. Salzman
,
Ronald N. Salzman
STI Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Neville F. Rieger
,
Neville F. Rieger
STI Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Letian Wang
Letian Wang
STI Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Ronald N. Salzman
STI Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY
Neville F. Rieger
STI Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY
Letian Wang
STI Technologies, Inc., Rochester, NY
Paper No:
POWER2004-52138, pp. 333-339; 7 pages
Published Online:
November 17, 2008
Citation
Salzman, RN, Rieger, NF, & Wang, L. "Turbine Blade Fatigue Crack Growth." Proceedings of the ASME 2004 Power Conference. ASME 2004 Power Conference. Baltimore, Maryland, USA. March 30–April 1, 2004. pp. 333-339. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/POWER2004-52138
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
- EasyBib
- Bookends
- Mendeley
- Papers
- EndNote
- RefWorks
- BibTex
- ProCite
- Medlars
Close
Sign In
22
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Fatigue Life Prediction Based on Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics: Case Study of Automotive Parts
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2016)
Extending the Fatigue Life of Solder Grid Array (SGA) Electronic Packages
J. Electron. Packag (March,2003)
Fatigue Performance of High-Pressure Waterjet-Peened Aluminum Alloy
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2002)
Related Chapters
Fatigue Crack Growth, Fatigue, and Stress Corrosion Crack Growth: Section XI Evaluation
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes
Introductory Information
The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Third Edition
A New Formula on Fatigue Crack Propagation
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology 2009 (ICMET 2009)