Submarine is usually equipped with two different control device arrangements, namely a cruciform and a X rudder configuration. In this paper, numerical simulations of the DARPA Suboff submarine and its retrofitted submarine with a X rudder configuration are presented. Turning simulations in model scale were studied to compare the turning abilities of the two different control device arrangements. The computations were performed with a house viscous CFD solver based on the conservative finite difference method. In the solver, RANS equation are solved coupled with six degrees of freedom (6DOF) solid body motion equations of the submarine in real time. The structured dynamic overlapping grids were used to simulate the real-time changes of the attitude of the submarine and the rotation of the rudder. The volume force method was used to replace the real propeller to realize the self-propelled movement of submarine. In the free running maneuvering simulations, the submarines move at the same initial velocity and rudder angle, restricted to the horizontal plane with four degrees of freedom (4DOF). Comparisons of the trajectory and kinematic parameters including relative turning radius and turning period between the two cases were presented in this paper. The results show that, compared with the cruciform rudder configuration, the X rudder configuration has obvious advantages for submarine in the turning abilities.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
June 17–22, 2018
Madrid, Spain
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5126-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparisons of Turning Abilities of Submarine With Different Rudder Configurations Available to Purchase
Dakui Feng,
Dakui Feng
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Xuanshu Chen,
Xuanshu Chen
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Hao Liu,
Hao Liu
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Zhiguo Zhang,
Zhiguo Zhang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Xianzhou Wang
Xianzhou Wang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Dakui Feng
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Xuanshu Chen
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Hao Liu
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Zhiguo Zhang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Xianzhou Wang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Paper No:
OMAE2018-77983, V07AT06A016; 6 pages
Published Online:
September 25, 2018
Citation
Feng, D, Chen, X, Liu, H, Zhang, Z, & Wang, X. "Comparisons of Turning Abilities of Submarine With Different Rudder Configurations." Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 7A: Ocean Engineering. Madrid, Spain. June 17–22, 2018. V07AT06A016. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77983
Download citation file:
81
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Experimental Investigation of the Submarine Crashback Maneuver
J. Fluids Eng (January,2008)
A Composite Rigid Body Algorithm for Modeling and Simulation of an Underwater Vehicle Equipped With Manipulator Arms
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2006)
Dynamic Modeling of a Six Degree-of-Freedom Flight Simulator Motion Base
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam (September,2015)
Related Chapters
CFD Analysis of Propeller Tip Vortex Cavitation in Ship Wake Fields
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Propeller Cavitation Noise Radiated from Single and Twin-Screw Cargo Liners: CFD Prediction and Full Scale Validation
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
CFD Simulations of a Mixed-flow Pump Using Various Turbulence Models
Mixed-flow Pumps: Modeling, Simulation, and Measurements