As the demand for modern ships grows to meet greater reliability, fuel efficiency, and economy, the interest in reducing structural weight while enhancing safety has also increased. Ship structural optimization is usually a mixed discrete-continuous design problem constrained by buckling and material strength, and involves the optimization of a large number of variables such as (continuous/discrete) plate thickness, scantlings of stiffeners and frames, and the (discrete) number of stiffeners and frames. Further complication arises when the structure is constrained by buckling and strength under compression and subject to practical design rules. Although 3D finite element analysis are widely used for full ship structure stresses and limit state analysis, their application for structural optimization is still prohibitive due to the computational cost. In this paper a multi-level heuristic based multi-objective optimization is formulated and used to optimize a large and complex thin-wall structure on the basis of weight, and safety. The optimization procedure has three levels: (1) For each stiffened panel, a heuristic based multi-objective optimization method is used to minimize its weight and maximize its safety, and a Pareto front is obtained. The ALPS/ULSAP ultimate limit state criteria, which is parametric formulated, mesh free, computational efficient, and is able to predict six different failure modes for a stiffened panel, are used to formulate the safety objective function. (2) Use the Pareto front of each panel as a gene pool to optimize the hull girder global properties, such as hull girder cross section area moment of inertia and vertical center of gravity (VCG). (3) Minimize the difference between the design variables from the local optimization and the global optimization by iterating 3D finite element analysis of the full ship. An example of optimizing the longitudinal structures of a full cargo hold of a 200,000 ton oil tanker is presented. The numerical results show that the proposed method is very useful to perform ultimate strength based ship structural optimization with multi-objectives, namely minimization of the structural weight and maximization of structural safety.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
June 19–24, 2016
Busan, South Korea
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5000-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Hierarchically Decomposed Multi-Level Optimization for Ship Structural Design
Jeom Kee Paik,
Jeom Kee Paik
Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
Search for other works by this author on:
Tobin McNatt
Tobin McNatt
DRS Technologies Inc., Stevensville, MD
Search for other works by this author on:
Ming Ma
DRS Technologies Inc., Stevensville, MD
Jeom Kee Paik
Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
Tobin McNatt
DRS Technologies Inc., Stevensville, MD
Paper No:
OMAE2016-54452, V009T13A009; 10 pages
Published Online:
October 18, 2016
Citation
Ma, M, Paik, JK, & McNatt, T. "Hierarchically Decomposed Multi-Level Optimization for Ship Structural Design." Proceedings of the ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 9: Prof. Norman Jones Honoring Symposium on Impact Engineering; Prof. Yukio Ueda Honoring Symposium on Idealized Nonlinear Mechanics for Welding and Strength of Structures. Busan, South Korea. June 19–24, 2016. V009T13A009. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-54452
Download citation file:
25
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Code Development for Ship Structures—A Demonstration
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,1997)
Analysis on the Hull Girder Ultimate Strength of a Bulk Carrier Using Simplified Method Based on an Incremental-Iterative Approach
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2008)
Structural Reliability of a Suezmax Oil Tanker Designed According to New Common Structural Rules
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2008)
Related Chapters
Subsection NB—Class 1 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition
Subsection NB—Class 1 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition
Fatigue Analysis in the Connecting Rod of MF285 Tractor by Finite Element Method
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)