This paper is a continuation of a series of investigation for the dual stiffness approach for polyester mooring lines. Tahar et. al. (2012) has presented the global performance comparison between the dual stiffness method and the traditional method for the Spar platform. As shown in that study, there are appreciable differences between the former and the later methods especially in lateral motions, which, however, result in little difference in SCR strength response. Is it because the Spar has better motion characteristics than other wet tree floating platforms such as the semisubmersible and FPSO? This paper will investigate the effect of the dual stiffness method and the traditional method to SCR response for a Semisubmersible platform. The fully coupled dynamic analysis tool CHARM3D has been modified to incorporate the dual stiffness approach. Two axial stiffnesses (EA) of polyester line, post installation (static) stiffness and storm (dynamic) stiffness have been convoluted into a dual stiffness to represent the total response of the floating platform in a single run. In the traditional method, the analyses are done twice, one run for each stiffness. Then, the extremes from each run are used as governing values for design. The SCR will be modeled and analyzed using ABAQUS software.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.