The unique and harsh environment of the arctic region requires specialized process area designs and safety solutions. One main process safety issue in the arctic is the need for more enclosed modules. Enclosed modules are used for two reasons; to prevent ice and snow to expose the process equipment; and to prevent the cold climate to impose an unduly harsh working environment for operators. The enclosed mechanically ventilated process modules are different from the open naturally ventilated process modules that are normally used in offshore facilities. The explosion safety performance of the non-standard mechanically ventilated process modules has therefore been studied in detail through several extensive programs of CFD simulations; see [1], [2] and [3]. It is seen that confined and mechanically ventilated modules has explosion risk drivers that are distinctly different from open and naturally ventilated modules. The following is seen to have significant impact on the explosion risk levels on confined process modules; the module size; the HVAC philosophy; the ignition source isolation efficiency; and the use of pressure release panels. These factors, and their impact on the explosion risk, are discussed in this paper. The presented conclusions are of high importance in future developments in arctic climate.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
July 1–6, 2012
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4489-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Explosion Safety Drivers for Arctic Platform Designs
Jan Pappas
Jan Pappas
Scandpower, Oslo, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Joar Dalheim
Scandpower, Oslo, Norway
Sverre Nodland
Scandpower, Houston, TX
Jan Pappas
Scandpower, Oslo, Norway
Paper No:
OMAE2012-83026, pp. 11-14; 4 pages
Published Online:
August 23, 2013
Citation
Dalheim, J, Nodland, S, & Pappas, J. "Explosion Safety Drivers for Arctic Platform Designs." Proceedings of the ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 2: Structures, Safety and Reliability. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. July 1–6, 2012. pp. 11-14. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83026
Download citation file:
12
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition in a Full-Scale Konvoi-Type Pressurized Water Reactor
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (October,2017)
Pacific Ocean Windspeeds Prediction by Gaidai Multivariate Risks Evaluation Method, Utilizing Self-Deconvolution
ASME Open J. Engineering (January,2024)
On the Violence of High Explosive Reactions
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2005)
Related Chapters
Introduction to Pipeline Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Combining Asset Integrity Management and Resilience in Coping with Extreme Climate Events in Electrical Power Grids
Asset Integrity Management of Critical Infrastructure