The harsh environment of the arctic requires specialized safety solutions. One main safety issue in the arctic is the need for more enclosed modules. Enclosed modules are used for two reasons; to prevent ice and snow to expose the process equipment; and to prevent the cold climate to impose an unduly harsh working environment for operators. The enclosed mechanically ventilated process modules are different from the open naturally ventilated process modules that are normally used in offshore facilities. The explosion safety performance of the non-standard mechanically ventilated process modules has therefore been studied in detail through an extensive program of CFD simulations. It is seen that mechanically ventilated modules has explosion risk drivers that are distinctly different from risk drivers in naturally ventilated modules. It is seen that the ignition source isolation efficiency is significantly more important for confined modules than for standard naturally ventilated modules. The explosion design loads are therefore strongly depending on the ignition source isolation efficiency. Isolation control, and its impact on the explosion design loads, is discussed in this paper. The presented conclusions are of high importance in future developments in arctic climate.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
June 19–24, 2011
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4433-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Improved Structural Integrity for Arctic Designs by Ignition Isolation Control
Jan Pappas
Jan Pappas
Scandpower, Sandvika, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Joar Dalheim
Scandpower, Kjeller, Norway
Sverre Nodland
Scandpower, Houston, TX
Jan Pappas
Scandpower, Sandvika, Norway
Paper No:
OMAE2011-49402, pp. 927-930; 4 pages
Published Online:
October 31, 2011
Citation
Dalheim, J, Nodland, S, & Pappas, J. "Improved Structural Integrity for Arctic Designs by Ignition Isolation Control." Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands. June 19–24, 2011. pp. 927-930. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2011-49402
Download citation file:
6
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition in a Full-Scale Konvoi-Type Pressurized Water Reactor
ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci (October,2017)
Mechanics of Geological Materials
Appl. Mech. Rev (October,1985)
Reliability Analysis of Offshore Production Facilities Under Arctic Conditions Using Reliability Data From Other Areas
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2014)
Related Chapters
Introduction to Pipeline Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach
Insights and Results of the Shutdown PSA for a German SWR 69 Type Reactor (PSAM-0028)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
HIGH STRAIN WELD SOLUTIONS FOR GEOHAZARD ACTIVE ENVIRONMENT
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)