Over the years many methods are evolved for computing ship motions and loads, i.e. seakeeping analysis. All of these methods are known as potential flow methods where fluid is assumed to be irrotational. In these methods velocity vector is represented as a gradient of scalar potential phi (φ) known as velocity potential. One of the oldest methods is strip theory method where ship is descretized into number of 2D strips. Other methods are panel methods where entire hull is descretized into number of panels. These are also known as Green’s function methods. Various formulations of Green’s function do exist. In a recent development Green’s function methods are extended to Rankine Panel method (RPM) where free surface in the vicinity of vessel is panelized for computations. In RPM Green’s function computations are made easy. Again these methods are divided into frequency domain and time domain. Time domain methods take into account various nonlinearities which generally cannot be handled by frequency domain methods. For zero and non-zero forward speed of the vessel different formulations exist. All these methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Hence, it is very important in the initial design stage to decide on method of seakeeping analysis. Here an attempt is made to compare the results of seakeeping analysis using various tools based on various seakeeping methods.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
June 19–24, 2011
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4433-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparative Study of Seakeeping Analysis Results From Various Methods
Sharad S. Dhavalikar
Sharad S. Dhavalikar
Indian Register of Shipping, Mumbai, MH, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Sharad S. Dhavalikar
Indian Register of Shipping, Mumbai, MH, India
Paper No:
OMAE2011-49223, pp. 217-223; 7 pages
Published Online:
October 31, 2011
Citation
Dhavalikar, SS. "Comparative Study of Seakeeping Analysis Results From Various Methods." Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands. June 19–24, 2011. pp. 217-223. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2011-49223
Download citation file:
10
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Nonlinear Impact Loading in an Oblique Seaway
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2003)
A Computationally Efficient Implementation of Nonzero-Speed Transient Green Functions for Zero-Speed Nonlinear Seakeeping Problems
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (February,2017)
Numerical Analysis of a Surface Ship in Waves
J. Fluids Eng (March,2020)
Related Chapters
A Computational Framework for Antibiofouling System Design
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Out-Of-Order Matrix Processor: Implementation and Performance Evaluation
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2009)
Introduction
Design of Mechanical Bearings in Cardiac Assist Devices