One of the main aspects of subsea pipeline design is ensuring pipeline stability on the seabed under the action of hydrodynamic loads. Hydrodynamic loads acting on Piggyback Pipeline Systems have traditionally been determined by pipeline engineers using an ‘equivalent pipeline diameter’ approach. The approach is simple and assumes that hydrodynamic loads on the Piggyback Pipeline System are equal to the loads on a single pipeline with diameter equal to the projected height of the piggyback bundle (the sum of the large diameter pipeline, small diameter pipeline and gap between the pipelines) [1]. Hydrodynamic coefficients for single pipelines are used in combination with the ‘equivalent diameter pipe’ to determine the hydrodynamic loads on the Piggyback Pipeline System. In order to assess more accurately the dynamic response of a Piggyback Pipeline System, an extensive set of physical model tests has been performed to measure hydrodynamic forces on a Piggyback Pipeline System in combined waves and currents conditions, and to determine in-line and lift force coefficients which can be used in a dynamic stability analysis to generate the hydrodynamic forces on the pipeline [2]. This paper describes the implementation of the model testing results in finite elements dynamic stability analysis and presents a case study where the dynamic response of a Piggyback Pipeline System was assessed using both the conventional ‘equivalent diameter approach’ and the hydrodynamic coefficients determined using model testing. The responses predicted using both approaches were compared and key findings presented in the paper, in terms of adequacy of the equivalent diameter approach, and effect of piggyback gap (separation between the main line and the secondary line) on the response.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
June 6–11, 2010
Shanghai, China
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4913-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Dynamic Stability Response of Piggyback Pipelines
Hammam Zeitoun,
Hammam Zeitoun
J. P. Kenny Pty. Ltd., Perth, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Masˇa Brankovic´,
Masˇa Brankovic´
J. P. Kenny Pty. Ltd., Perth, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Knut To̸rnes,
Knut To̸rnes
J. P. Kenny Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Simon Wong,
Simon Wong
J. P. Kenny Pty. Ltd., Perth, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Eve Hollingsworth,
Eve Hollingsworth
J. P. Kenny Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew Pearce,
Andrew Pearce
Woodside Energy, Perth, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Hosi Sabavala
Hosi Sabavala
Woodside Energy, Perth, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Hammam Zeitoun
J. P. Kenny Pty. Ltd., Perth, Australia
Masˇa Brankovic´
J. P. Kenny Pty. Ltd., Perth, Australia
Knut To̸rnes
J. P. Kenny Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
Simon Wong
J. P. Kenny Pty. Ltd., Perth, Australia
Eve Hollingsworth
J. P. Kenny Norge AS, Stavanger, Norway
Andrew Pearce
Woodside Energy, Perth, Australia
Hosi Sabavala
Woodside Energy, Perth, Australia
Paper No:
OMAE2010-20756, pp. 731-739; 9 pages
Published Online:
December 22, 2010
Citation
Zeitoun, H, Brankovic´, M, To̸rnes, K, Wong, S, Hollingsworth, E, Pearce, A, & Sabavala, H. "Dynamic Stability Response of Piggyback Pipelines." Proceedings of the ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 5, Parts A and B. Shanghai, China. June 6–11, 2010. pp. 731-739. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2010-20756
Download citation file:
14
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Advanced Dynamic Stability Analysis
OMAE2009
Related Articles
A Response-Based Method for Developing Joint Metocean Criteria for On-Bottom Pipeline Stability
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2003)
Developing Innovative Deep Water Pipeline Construction Techniques with Physical Models
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (February,2007)
Solutions for Small Slope Pipeline Lifting Problems
J. Energy Resour. Technol (March,1984)
Related Chapters
Natural Gas Transmission
Pipeline Design & Construction: A Practical Approach, Third Edition
Subsection NF—Supports
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition
Transportation Pipelines, Including ASME B31.4, B31.8, B31.8S, B31G, and B31Q Codes
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes