High strength steels (X100 and X120) that are being considered for high pressure gas pipelines differ from conventional steels by exhibiting lower work hardening capacity, lower strain to failure and softening of their HAZ. These differences impact burst limit state and tensile limit state, in addition to crack arrest. In this paper, the impact of the variations in mechanical properties on the reliability of pipe limit states involving ductile burst of damaged or corroded pipe is examined. The paper presents the results of burst limit state analysis using state-of-the-art plastic burst models of strain hardening pipe and considering all the uncertainties that impact the margin of safety of pipes subject to internal pressure. Intact pipes, corroded pipes and externally damaged pipes are considered. A case study comparing the differences between normal strength (X60) pipeline and high strength (X100) pipeline is also presented.
Skip Nav Destination
25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
June 4–9, 2006
Hamburg, Germany
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4749-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Reliability of Burst Limit States for Damaged and Corroded High Strength Pipelines
Marc A. Maes,
Marc A. Maes
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Mamdouh M. Salama,
Mamdouh M. Salama
ConocoPhillips, Houston, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
Markus Dann
Markus Dann
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Marc A. Maes
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Mamdouh M. Salama
ConocoPhillips, Houston, TX
Markus Dann
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Paper No:
OMAE2006-92605, pp. 327-336; 10 pages
Published Online:
October 2, 2008
Citation
Maes, MA, Salama, MM, & Dann, M. "Reliability of Burst Limit States for Damaged and Corroded High Strength Pipelines." Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Volume 4: Terry Jones Pipeline Technology; Ocean Space Utilization; CFD and VIV Symposium. Hamburg, Germany. June 4–9, 2006. pp. 327-336. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2006-92605
Download citation file:
13
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Temporal Variability in Corrosion Modeling and Reliability Updating
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (November,2007)
Uncertainty Quantification and Structural Reliability Estimation Considering Inspection Data Scarcity
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (June,2015)
A New Approach of Reliability Design For Creep Rupture Property
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (December,2010)
Related Chapters
Repair Methods for Loadbearing Steel Structures Operating on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Reliability-Based Inspection Intervals of Offshore Jacket Fleets
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Reasons for Lay-Up
Consensus for the Lay-up of Boilers, Turbines, Turbine Condensors, and Auxiliary Equipment (CRTD-66)