Flow Assurance technologies are currently experiencing steady progress. Most new technologies are in many ways riskier than older ones, but they are also more efficient. It would be optimal for offshore operators ready to buy some novel technology to select the right offer, given their respective safety policies, from all existing possibilities. But operators hardly know of all these possibilities; the contractors who develop new technology do. But how could the latter optimally select the design option which should be offered to a given operator, to best serve its needs? The present paper deals with this question by connecting technical possibilities with company strategies in an integrated and quantified model: the output data of a physical model are entered as input into a psycho-management risk model. As a result, one can compute optimal characteristics for each operator of a new technology. This helps the contractor sell and monitor its offer under uncertainty. It also induces the operator to buy the innovative technology. We use some specific software developed at GRID (Group of research on Risk, Information and Decision, affiliated to ENSAM) to assess safety policies of operators. A real case is analyzed and presented. We argue that our model produces insight, by revealing knowledge which officers of the contractor company in long lasting contact with a given operator have internally accumulated, but which they are not able to express under any operational format. Such knowledge is ignored by industrial engineering, but often turns out to be richer than what can be extracted from any available data. One difficulty is to manage the software’s session in such a way that officers will answer the questions. The other difficulty is to convince engineering and risk managers that the “Human factor” is much richer than it is given credit for in textbooks and even more accurate than most existing data. Thus, we substantially improve existing industrial management techniques as currently applied to offshore technology, and more generally existing practice in the industry.
Skip Nav Destination
25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
June 4–9, 2006
Hamburg, Germany
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4748-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Safety Policy as a Tool in New Technology Offering: A Flow Assurance Case
Bertrand Munier,
Bertrand Munier
Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Arts et Me´tiers–Paris, Paris, France
Search for other works by this author on:
Marc Lassagne
Marc Lassagne
Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Arts et Me´tiers–Lille, Lille, France
Search for other works by this author on:
Bertrand Munier
Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Arts et Me´tiers–Paris, Paris, France
Pierre Besse
Bureau Veritas, Paris, France
Marc Lassagne
Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Arts et Me´tiers–Lille, Lille, France
Paper No:
OMAE2006-92388, pp. 195-201; 7 pages
Published Online:
October 2, 2008
Citation
Munier, B, Besse, P, & Lassagne, M. "Safety Policy as a Tool in New Technology Offering: A Flow Assurance Case." Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Volume 3: Safety and Reliability; Materials Technology; Douglas Faulkner Symposium on Reliability and Ultimate Strength of Marine Structures. Hamburg, Germany. June 4–9, 2006. pp. 195-201. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2006-92388
Download citation file:
5
Views
Related Articles
In Memoriam: Georg Ernest Otto Widera (1938–2022)
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2022)
Nuclear Multiscale Systems Analysis for Safety and Security
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2018)
Role Models
Mechanical Engineering (July,1999)
Related Chapters
Occupational Risk and Health System Design Process
International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems (ICIMCS 2011)
Application Computer Technology in the Engineering Supervision
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)