Design implies choice from among alternatives — for each alternative solution the designer should assess the total associated risk. The total risk is a composite of both the likelihood of various levels of hazards, and the uncertainty in the response behaviour of the system. The selection or decision process demands a weighing of the costs, risks, and benefits of the alternatives. Using an example, a probabilistic method is outlined for deciding upon the depth of burial of pipelines in shipping lanes. Producing a well-engineered solution to this problem involves the synthesis of many kinds of information. There is a requirement to analyse statistical information on the types of hazards, their frequencies and their possible growth. There is also generally a choice of measures that can be used to protect the pipeline. The choice of protective measure demands a weighing of costs, risks, and benefits and must also include any characteristic which leads to economic or other losses. In this paper each hazard is classified into five levels based on the amount of damage a hazard could impart on the system (this is termed the “demand levels”). These demand levels, when subjected to the system, result in various damage states. The damage states, which are assumed to be the cost of repair or replacement, are also represented in five discrete forms. These five general states of damage are defined in terms of such loss-related factors as level of repair cost, degree of the structural and non-structural damage and the fraction of people injured or killed.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2005 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
June 12–17, 2005
Halkidiki, Greece
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4197-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Protection of Pipelines in Shipping Lanes Available to Purchase
Sirous F. Yasseri,
Sirous F. Yasseri
Kellogg Brown and Root, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Jake Prager
Jake Prager
Kellogg Brown and Root, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Sirous F. Yasseri
Kellogg Brown and Root, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
Jake Prager
Kellogg Brown and Root, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
Paper No:
OMAE2005-67018, pp. 377-384; 8 pages
Published Online:
November 11, 2008
Citation
Yasseri, SF, & Prager, J. "Protection of Pipelines in Shipping Lanes." Proceedings of the ASME 2005 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering: Volume 3. Halkidiki, Greece. June 12–17, 2005. pp. 377-384. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2005-67018
Download citation file:
10
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
About the Influence of the Corrosion Defect Geometry on Repaired Pipes Stress Distribution
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2021)
Pacific Ocean Windspeeds Prediction by Gaidai Multivariate Risks Evaluation Method, Utilizing Self-Deconvolution
ASME Open J. Engineering (January,2024)
Novel Quantitative Risk Assessment Interface for Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration Platforms
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2020)
Related Chapters
Use of PSA in Lisencing of EPR 1600 in Finland (PSAM-0160)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Tank Reconstruction
A Quick Guide to API 653 Certified Storage Tank Inspector Syllabus: Example Questions and Worked Answers
A PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE RISK UNDER EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY: A HYDRO-TECHNICAL THREAT
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)