Estimation of high return period values of wind and wave conditions is usually done using a limited sample of data from measurement or hindcast studies. Because a finite sample size is used, the reliability of estimates is usually evaluated by constructing confidence intervals around design values such as the 100 year return value. In this paper, a numerical simulation study is used to compare the accuracy of calculated confidence intervals using several different calculation methods: the asymptotic normal, parametric bootstrap and profile likelihood methods. The accuracy of each method for different sample sizes is assessed for the truncated Weibull distribution. Based on these results, a profile likelihood method for estimation of confidence intervals is suggested for use when dealing with small datasets.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.