During the combustion of fuel in Waste-to-Energy (WTE) and coal-fired power plants, all of the mercury input in the feed is volatilized. The primary forms of mercury in stack gas are elemental mercury (Hg0) and mercuric ions (Hg2+) that are predominantly found as mercuric chloride. The most efficient way to remove mercury from the combustion gases is by means of dry scrubbing, followed by activated carbon injection and a fabric filter baghouse. Back in 1988, the U.S. WTE power plants emitted about 90 tons of mercury (Hg). By 2003, implementation of the EPA Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards, at a cost of one billion dollars, reduced WTE mercury emissions to less than one ton of mercury. EPA now considers coal-fired power plants to be the largest remaining anthropogenic source of mercury emissions. Approximately 800 million short tons of coal, containing nearly 80 short tons of Hg are combusted annually in the U.S. for electricity production. About 40% of this amount is presently captured in the gas control systems of coal-fired utilities. Since the concentration of mercury in U.S. coal is ten times lower than in the MSW feed and the volume of gas to be cleaned 55 times higher, the cost of implementing MACT by the U.S. coal-fired utilities is estimated to be about $25 billion. However, when this retrofit cost is compared to the total capital investment and revenues of the two industries, it is concluded that MACT should be affordable. Per kilogram of mercury to be captured, the cost of MACT implementation by the utilities will be twenty times higher than was for the WTE industry. However, implementation of MACT by the utilities will also reduce the emissions of other gaseous contaminants and of particulate matter.
Skip Nav Destination
13th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference
May 23–25, 2005
Orlando, Florida, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Solid Waste Processing Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3756-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
To MACT or Not to MACT: Mercury Emissions From Waste-to-Energy and Coal-Fired Power Plants
Nickolas J. Themelis,
Nickolas J. Themelis
Columbia University, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Nada Assaf-Anid
Nada Assaf-Anid
Columbia University, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Nickolas J. Themelis
Columbia University, New York, NY
Nada Assaf-Anid
Columbia University, New York, NY
Paper No:
NAWTEC13-3170, pp. 203-209; 7 pages
Published Online:
November 11, 2008
Citation
Themelis, NJ, & Assaf-Anid, N. "To MACT or Not to MACT: Mercury Emissions From Waste-to-Energy and Coal-Fired Power Plants." Proceedings of the 13th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference. 13th North American Waste-to-Energy Conference. Orlando, Florida, USA. May 23–25, 2005. pp. 203-209. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/NAWTEC13-3170
Download citation file:
6
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
The Performance of Fabric Filters in a Pilot Baghouse During Coal Water Fuel Combustion Trials
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,1987)
Electrical Stimulation of Fabric Filtration (ESFF) for Cotton Dust Control
J. Eng. Ind (February,1979)
Emission Characteristics and Control Technology for Stationary Coal-Fueled Diesel Engines
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,1989)
Related Chapters
A Case Study of Gasification CHP in Northern Italy in the European Context and Comparison to Traditional Combustion Systems
Proceedings of 2018 EEC/WTERT Conference
“iEnergy-from-Waste”: Evolution or Revolution in Automation for Municipal Waste Treatment Facilities?
Proceedings of 2018 EEC/WTERT Conference
Conclusions
Clean and Efficient Coal-Fired Power Plants: Development Toward Advanced Technologies