Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
NARROW
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Shales
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. JRC2020, 2020 Joint Rail Conference, V001T06A006, April 20–22, 2020
Paper No: JRC2020-8099
Abstract
Railroad tank car transportation is the most efficient way to transport large amounts of hazardous material. More than 2 million tank-car loads of hazardous materials (hazmat) are transported annually by rail in the United States. Recently, the boom in the production of petroleum crude oil and natural gases from shale has dramatically increased the rail transport volume of flammable energy resources. However, accidents do occur, and the transportation of flammable hazardous material can result in disastrous consequences. The fire can heat up a tank car, rapidly increasing the inside pressure and causing the tank car to either rupture or explode. Railroad companies are developing or seeking advanced thermal protection systems to prevent tank car explosion or prolong the burst time to win a sufficient rescue time. It is of great importance to understand the existing thermal protection systems used in hazmat tank cars and to identify key priorities that the government and industry consider for improving tank car thermal protection performance, providing guidance for future thermal protection material development. Thus, this paper reviews the literature on the effects and analysis of different tank car thermal protection systems, identifying the effectiveness of different thermal protection components, properties of thermal protection materials, and testing methodologies. Different combinations of insulators and jackets are tested in order to observe the effects of the fire on the tank car. The tank car is tested while carrying hazardous material like liquefied petroleum gas, propane, and ethylene oxide, etc. This investigation analyzes the differences of thermal protection systems in prolonging the life span of a tank car engulfed in flames. A tank car can use either material like fiberglass, ceramic fiber blankets, perlite powder, or urethane foam to better insulate and thermally protect the tank car. An insulator is shown to prolong the life span of a tank car since bare tank cars tend to heat up rapidly when exposed to flames. The thermal protection system of a tank car is built of insulators, jackets, and supporting material for the insulator. The supporting material and jacket combination with the insulator also prevent the tank car from heating up rapidly. There are two primary testing methods, pool fire, and torch fire. Each type of fire has different outcomes and limits in which the tank car can withstand. When testing the heating of a tank car, thermocouples were placed throughout a tank car and recorded to check what areas were heated the most during the experiment. Some factors that had been accounted for in the previous studies were the wind speed and the direction of the wind, which affected the overall experiment, mostly torch fire experiments.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. JRC2014, 2014 Joint Rail Conference, V001T06A014, April 2–4, 2014
Paper No: JRC2014-3851
Abstract
The recent expansion in the production of shale petroleum crude oil, combined with the lack of new pipeline construction, has placed the railroads at the center stage for safe and efficient transport of very large volumes of this commodity. Petroleum crude oil poses fire risk in the event of train accidents. The consequence modeling based on the US DOT Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) or ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres), a popular atmospheric dispersion model used for evaluating releases of hazardous chemical vapors, may be overly simplistic and limited to estimate the risk of flammable liquid releases. This paper aims to address this gap and develop a simple model to estimate flammable liquid release consequences, focusing on petroleum crude oil. A flow model using the spatial geographic information system (GIS) and the digital elevation model (DEM) is developed. The methodology was illustrated with a case study comparing the results from the model to the area affected from the Lac-Mégantic accident. Although the model does not consider advanced flow types or fire propagation, the results accurately describe the consequences of the accident, demonstrating the potential capability of this methodology to estimate the consequences of a crude oil release.