The main objective in optimizing train control is to eliminate the waist associated with classical design where train separation is determined through the use of “worst case” assumptions that are invariant to the system. In fact, the worst case approach has been in place since the beginning of train control systems. Worst case takes the most conservative approach to the determination of train stopping distance, which is the basis for design of virtually all train control. This leads to stopping distances that could be far more that actually required under the circumstances at the time the train is attempting to brake. Modern train control systems are designed to separate trains in order to provide safety of operation while increasing throughput. Calculations for the minimum distance that separates trains have traditionally been based on the sum of a series of worst case scenarios. The implication was that no train could ever exceed this distance in stopping. This distance is called Safe Braking Distance (SBD). SBD has always been calculated by static parameters that were assumed to be invariant. This is, however, not the case. Parameters such as adhesion, acceleration, weight, and reaction vary over time, location or velocity. Since the worst case is always used in the calculation, inefficiencies result in this methodology which causes degradation in capacity and throughput. This is also true when mixed traffic with different stopping characteristics are present at the same time. The classic theory in train control utilizes a SBD model to describe the characteristics of a stopping train. Since knowledge of these conditions is not known, poor conditions are assumed. A new concept in train control utilizes statistical analysis and estimation to provide knowledge of the conditions. Trains operating along the line utilize these techniques to understand inputs into their SBD calculation. This provides for a SBD calculation on board the train that is the shortest possible that maintains the required level of safety. The new SBD is a prime determinant in systems capacity. Therefore by optimizing SBD as describes, system capacity is also optimized. The system continuously adjusts to changing conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
2011 Joint Rail Conference
March 16–18, 2011
Pueblo, Colorado, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Rail Transportation Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5459-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Statistical Safe Braking Analysis
David F. Thurston
David F. Thurston
Temple University; Parsons Transportation Group, Philadelphia, PA
Search for other works by this author on:
David F. Thurston
Temple University; Parsons Transportation Group, Philadelphia, PA
Paper No:
JRC2011-56079, pp. 379-386; 8 pages
Published Online:
February 8, 2012
Citation
Thurston, DF. "Statistical Safe Braking Analysis." Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Rail Conference. 2011 Joint Rail Conference. Pueblo, Colorado, USA. March 16–18, 2011. pp. 379-386. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2011-56079
Download citation file:
17
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Feedback Control of Braking Deceleration on Railway Vehicle
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (June,2006)
Development of a Vehicle Stability Control System Using Brake-by-Wire Actuators
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (January,2008)
Heat Transfer Enhancement in Ventilated Brake Disk Using Double Airfoil Vanes
J. Thermal Sci. Eng. Appl (December,2011)
Related Chapters
Application of Probabilistic Methods for the Evaluation of Deterministic Deviations from Technical Specifications (PSAM-0277)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Insights and Results of the Shutdown PSA for a German SWR 69 Type Reactor (PSAM-0028)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Evaluation of the Safety in the Rail Vehicles Traffic Using Statistical Methods (PSAM-0469)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)