Because of the stochastic nature of line pipe characteristics a small percentage of the pipe joints in a given pipeline may possess actual yield strengths below the specified minimum yield strength. During a hydrostatic test these segments may experience some plastic deformation as the hoop stress approaches the yield point. It is well known that the effect of room temperature creep near the yield becomes notable and therefore can affect pressure trending during the hold period (leak test). In this work a numerical model is developed for the analysis of creep deformation. A conceptual study is carried out to demonstrate potential effects of creep on hydrostatic test pressure trending during a leak test. This analysis can help operators understand the potential effects of creep and distinguish it from other factors such as temperature changes or leakage and can help identify, or rule out, the occurrence of pipe yielding during hydrostatic tests.
Skip Nav Destination
2018 12th International Pipeline Conference
September 24–28, 2018
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5188-3
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Effect of Room Temperature Creep on Hydrostatic Leak Test
Benjamin B. Zand,
Benjamin B. Zand
Kiefner and Associates, Columbus, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Adam Steiner
Adam Steiner
Kiefner and Associates, Columbus, OH
Search for other works by this author on:
Benjamin B. Zand
Kiefner and Associates, Columbus, OH
Adam Steiner
Kiefner and Associates, Columbus, OH
Paper No:
IPC2018-78360, V003T04A047; 10 pages
Published Online:
November 6, 2018
Citation
Zand, BB, & Steiner, A. "Effect of Room Temperature Creep on Hydrostatic Leak Test." Proceedings of the 2018 12th International Pipeline Conference. Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 24–28, 2018. V003T04A047. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78360
Download citation file:
28
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Some comments on the paper “Microplane constitutive model and metal plasticity” (Brocca M and Bazˇant ZP, 2000, Appl Mech Rev 53 (10) 265–281)
Appl. Mech. Rev (March,2002)
Author’s Reply to “Some comments on the paper ‘Microplane constitutive model and metal plasticity’ (Brocca M and Bazˇant ZP, 2000, Appl Mech Rev 53(10) 265–281),” by A Lagzdin¸sˇ and V Tamuzˇs
Appl. Mech. Rev (March,2002)
Hydrostatic Retesting of Existing Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,1984)
Related Chapters
Pressure Testing
Process Piping: The Complete Guide to ASME B31.3, Third Edition
Compressive Deformation of Hot-Applied Rubberized Asphalt Waterproofing
Roofing Research and Standards Development: 10th Volume
Final Report
Applications Guide for Determining the Yield Strength of In-Service Pipe by Hardness Evaluation: Final Report