A significant amount of effort has been expended in the area of advancing pipeline dent remaining life assessment methods beginning in the late 1980s and extending to the current day. Initial research efforts were primarily empirical in nature while more recent research efforts have incorporated finite element modelling. Coupled with advancements in assessment techniques, the capabilities of advanced in-line inspection (ILI) tools have increased to a point where they can provide consistent, reliable information that is suitable for dent assessments. As a result of these advancements in assessment models and ILI tools, operators can now perform remaining life assessments using ILI data, and a multitude of remaining life assessment models are available, including solutions from the European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG), Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI), American Petroleum Institute (API), and finite-element based approaches. In addition to these remaining life assessments, many operators routinely perform strain-based assessments based on guidance from ASME B31.8. To date, there have been few studies comparing the various assessment methods on large numbers of dents, and as a result, significant questions persist as to the conservatism inherent in each method. In addition, the EPRG and PRCI methods are largely based on full-scale testing and finite-element models performed with idealized indenter shapes while actual pipeline dents typically exhibit complex shapes and interactions between multiple dents. Each model also has limitations and advantages that are discussed in this paper, such as ease of use and how pipeline geometry and weld association are considered. This paper provides a robust comparison of selected dent assessment methodologies on 220 actual dents from a 24-inch pipeline with depths ranging from 0.6–4.5% OD, and 32 dents from a 30-inch line with depths ranging from 1–2.5% OD. The assessment includes both top and bottom of line dents and investigates the influence of restraint on remaining life. The results presented in the paper are based on high-resolution ILI caliper data collected during two in-line inspections. Furthermore, the paper provides statistical comparisons between strain and remaining life methodologies and also between the various remaining life assessments. The paper also provides a comparison of the restraint parameter from the PRCI model with calculated stress concentration factors from finite-element models. The paper provides a first of its kind comparison of the various methods and discusses how the work may be extended to other pipe diameters and wall thicknesses.
Skip Nav Destination
2018 12th International Pipeline Conference
September 24–28, 2018
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5186-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
An Authoritative Comparison of Remaining Life Assessments for Pipeline Dents
Chris Holliday,
Chris Holliday
ROSEN UK, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Luis Torres,
Luis Torres
Enbridge Pipelines, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Damien Hagan
Damien Hagan
ROSEN UK, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Rhett Dotson
ROSEN USA, Houston, TX
Chris Holliday
ROSEN UK, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Luis Torres
Enbridge Pipelines, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Damien Hagan
ROSEN UK, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Paper No:
IPC2018-78247, V001T03A060; 9 pages
Published Online:
November 6, 2018
Citation
Dotson, R, Holliday, C, Torres, L, & Hagan, D. "An Authoritative Comparison of Remaining Life Assessments for Pipeline Dents." Proceedings of the 2018 12th International Pipeline Conference. Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 24–28, 2018. V001T03A060. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78247
Download citation file:
48
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
About the Influence of the Corrosion Defect Geometry on Repaired Pipes Stress Distribution
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2021)
Effects of Weld Geometry Size on the Pressure-Bearing Capacity of an API X80 LSAW Pipe
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2020)
Gas Coupled Ultrasonic Measurement of Pipeline Wall Thickness
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2005)
Related Chapters
Introduction
History of Line Pipe Manufacturing in North America
API RP 574: Inspection Practices for Piping Components
The API ICP Exam Handbook: Complete Guide to Passing the API 510/570/653 ICP Exams
Inspection and Remaining Life Assessment of Subsea Pipelines Exposed to Various Forms of Internal Corrosion Degradation Mechanisms
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities