Land disturbance associated with the progressive expansion of a major pipeline and power corridor, along with extensive timber harvesting, triggered the reactivation of an ancient, 100 million cubic meter deep-seated landslide in northern Alberta. The landslide threatened six major transmission pipelines, and caused a loss of containment in one of the pipelines. The level of landslide activity and associated pipeline damage was surprising given the relatively subtle disturbances in relation to the massive scale of the slide. Given the very shallow 4.5 degree slope inclination and the lack of any surface expression of distress over most of the slope area, this case history underscores the importance of considering regionally specific geological conditions within pipeline geohazard evaluations. An intensive, multi-pronged program was adopted to stabilize and manage the landslide, including a series of targeted surface and ground water control measures that produced an approximate 100-fold reduction in movement rates. This demonstrates that the sensitivity of slides in the region to subtle changes is a negative factor for triggering landslides, but can also be a positive factor for stabilizing them.
Skip Nav Destination
2016 11th International Pipeline Conference
September 26–30, 2016
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5027-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
The Cheecham Landslide Event
J. Peter Barlow,
J. Peter Barlow
BGC Engineering Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
John A. Richmond
John A. Richmond
Enbridge, Liquids Pipelines, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Peter Barlow
BGC Engineering Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada
John A. Richmond
Enbridge, Liquids Pipelines, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Paper No:
IPC2016-64515, V003T04A022; 10 pages
Published Online:
November 10, 2016
Citation
Barlow, JP, & Richmond, JA. "The Cheecham Landslide Event." Proceedings of the 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference. Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and Joining. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 26–30, 2016. V003T04A022. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2016-64515
Download citation file:
22
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Finite Element Analysis-Unascertained Measure Theory-Based Hybrid Approach to Safety Assessment for Pipelines Subject to Landslide Disasters
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2024)
Review of State-Of-The-Art: Drag Forces on Submarine Pipelines and Piles Caused by Landslide or Debris Flow Impact
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (February,2009)
A Ground Resistance for Vertical Bore Heat Exchangers With Groundwater Flow
J. Energy Resour. Technol (September,2003)
Related Chapters
GROUND MOVEMENT HAZARDS (LANDSLIDES, SUBSIDENCE) AND PIPELINES: AN OVERVIEW
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
AN OVERVIEW OF CURRENT METHODS FOR MONITORING LANDSLIDE GROUND MOVEMENT TO BETTER UNDERSTAND POTENTIAL HAZARDS TO BURIED PIPELINES
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
CREATION AND MANAGEMENT OF A LANDSLIDE AND EROSION GEOHAZARDS INVENTORY FOR NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES IN CALIFORNIA
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)