The pipeline industry has been managing the threat of Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) for several years using the methods developed by NACE SCCDA [1] (Stress Corrosion Cracking Direct Assessment) and ASME B31.8S [2] standards. SCCDA is a widely accepted tool for assessing the threat of Stress Corrosion Cracking in pipelines. The process utilizes data from direct examinations at excavations to validate the process as well as to address existing SCC anomalies, if found. However, neither the recommended practices nor the literature provide a usable and practical method for determining the number of excavations necessary for the excavation program based on observed results. To address this question, the Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) sponsored a project to develop a statistically defendable procedure to determine the number of excavations which would be required to validate the SCCDA process and confirm either the presence or absence of SCC.
Skip Nav Destination
2016 11th International Pipeline Conference
September 26–30, 2016
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5025-1
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Determining the Number of Excavations Required to Confirm the Presence or Absence of SCC on a Pipeline Following an SCCDA Process
Guy Desjardins,
Guy Desjardins
Desjardins Integrity Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
John MacKenzie,
John MacKenzie
Kiefner and Associates, Inc., Bellingham, WA
Search for other works by this author on:
David Aguiar
David Aguiar
Pacific Gas and Electric, San Ramon, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Guy Desjardins
Desjardins Integrity Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
John MacKenzie
Kiefner and Associates, Inc., Bellingham, WA
David Aguiar
Pacific Gas and Electric, San Ramon, CA
Paper No:
IPC2016-64701, V001T03A043; 10 pages
Published Online:
November 10, 2016
Citation
Desjardins, G, MacKenzie, J, & Aguiar, D. "Determining the Number of Excavations Required to Confirm the Presence or Absence of SCC on a Pipeline Following an SCCDA Process." Proceedings of the 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference. Volume 1: Pipelines and Facilities Integrity. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 26–30, 2016. V001T03A043. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2016-64701
Download citation file:
16
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Mechanisms of High-pH and Near-Neutral-pH SCC of Underground Pipelines
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2001)
Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of Tungsten Inert Gas Welded Age-Hardenable AA6061 Alloy
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (October,2019)
Determination of Conditional Probability of Dynamic Ductile Axial Crack Arrest for Conventionally-Rolled, Lower-Toughness Linepipe Materials
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,2005)
Related Chapters
DEVELOPMENTS IN STRAIN-BASED FRACTURE ASSESSMENTS - A PERSPECTIVE
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Re-Qualification of Existing Subsea Pipelines for CO 2 and H 2 Transport, Structural Integrity Challenges
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Direct Assessment: Process, Technologies and Modeling
Pipeline Integrity Management Systems: A Practical Approach