States are facing multiple challenges around new pipeline infrastructure as a result of unconventional oil and gas development. In many instances, federal oversight of interstate pipelines has failed to keep up with state interest in new pipelines. However, some states lack an efficient centralized or streamlined siting and permitting process to accommodate new development. This paper examines the different approaches by various states and what oil and gas companies can do to minimize risk by balancing the competing public and private interests to obtain the necessary permits and approvals without delaying project construction. The paper includes discussion of both Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulated natural gas pipelines as well as crude oil and product lines not regulated by FERC. In addition, this paper provides a first-hand perspective on how public opposition can change the regulatory landscape during the course of a project using the Keystone XL Project as an example. After the Keystone XL Project ran into permitting issues, the Nebraska Legislature modified its law, directing the state to evaluate the environmental, economic, social and other impacts of the Nebraska segment of the project. Because the state did not have a specific NEPA process, Nebraska had to first establish a process to conduct the state’s evaluation and produce the functional equivalent of a NEPA document, resulting in project delays. This paper also describes how the evolving use of social media has provided a mechanism for rapid dissemination of information for both project opponents and proponents. There is a heightened national awareness that may now target certain projects based on impacts to select environmental resources such that just meeting the minimum regulatory requirements may not be enough moving forward. In today’s regulatory environment, strategic planning and communications are critical to raise awareness in advance of the potential opposition.
Skip Nav Destination
2014 10th International Pipeline Conference
September 29–October 3, 2014
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4610-0
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Understanding State Variability and Recommendations for Minimizing Schedule Risk in Pipeline Siting and Development Available to Purchase
Rosemary C. Hargrave,
Rosemary C. Hargrave
HDR, Denver, CO
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephanie L. White
Stephanie L. White
HDR, Denver, CO
Search for other works by this author on:
John H. Morton
HDR, Omaha, NE
Steve T. Rowe
HDR, Denver, CO
Rosemary C. Hargrave
HDR, Denver, CO
Catherine F. Storey
HDR, Denver, CO
Stephanie L. White
HDR, Denver, CO
Paper No:
IPC2014-33504, V001T04A007; 8 pages
Published Online:
December 9, 2014
Citation
Morton, JH, Rowe, ST, Hargrave, RC, Storey, CF, & White, SL. "Understanding State Variability and Recommendations for Minimizing Schedule Risk in Pipeline Siting and Development." Proceedings of the 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference. Volume 1: Design and Construction; Environment; Pipeline Automation and Measurement. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 29–October 3, 2014. V001T04A007. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33504
Download citation file:
14
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Reliability Based Design and Assessment for Location-Specific Failure Threats With Application to Natural Gas Pipelines
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2009)
CFD Numerical Simulation of the Submarine Pipeline With a Spoiler
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2009)
Industrial and Central Station
J. Eng. Power (July,1959)
Related Chapters
Pipeline Integrity and Security
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards
GUIDELINES FOR MANAGING GEOHAZARDS AFFECTING THE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OIL AND NATURAL GAS PIPELINES
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Pipeline Integrity
Pipeline Design & Construction: A Practical Approach, Third Edition