Large hydrostatic test programs require extensive pre-planning to avoid increased costs and delayed schedules. Recently, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. completed construction and testing of more than 1,200 km of an NPS 36 oil pipeline for the Line 4 Extension Project and the Canadian portion of the Alberta Clipper Expansion Project over three construction seasons. A total of 57 mainline hydrostatic tests were successfully completed and approved by the National Energy Board. Following the first construction and hydrostatic testing season, many lessons were learned that were implemented for hydrostatic testing during the second construction season. The most important aspect of large pipeline hydrostatic test programs is locating and securing water sources. Extensive ground truthing must be preformed to adequately determine locations, volumes and access to water sources. Once potential sources are identified, water quality and environmental issues must be assessed, which leads to applying for and obtaining the necessary permits for water withdrawal and discharge. Leaving an important item such as water sources to be “field-determined” can lead to unanticipated complications, schedule delay and increased construction costs. Water sources are just one of the many important pre-planning activities that must be given adequate attention before the start of pipeline construction to successfully and efficiently manage a large pipeline hydrostatic test program. Many projects only complete high-level desktop-based hydrostatic test planning during the detailed design phase of a project. However, the potential cost and schedule impacts far outweigh the extra costs required to complete proper pre-planning during the detailed engineering phase of a project.
Skip Nav Destination
2010 8th International Pipeline Conference
September 27–October 1, 2010
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- International Petroleum Technology Institute and the Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4421-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
The Importance of Pre-Planning for Large Hydrostatic Test Programs
Andrew Keith Bennett,
Andrew Keith Bennett
WorleyParsons Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Everett Clementi Wong
Everett Clementi Wong
Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew Keith Bennett
WorleyParsons Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Everett Clementi Wong
Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada
Paper No:
IPC2010-31430, pp. 99-103; 5 pages
Published Online:
April 4, 2011
Citation
Bennett, AK, & Wong, EC. "The Importance of Pre-Planning for Large Hydrostatic Test Programs." Proceedings of the 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference. 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 2. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 27–October 1, 2010. pp. 99-103. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31430
Download citation file:
10
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Developing Innovative Deep Water Pipeline Construction Techniques with Physical Models
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (February,2007)
Comparative Risks of Hydrostatic and Pneumatic Pipeline Testing
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2020)
Pressure Testing Feedwater Heaters and Power Plant Auxiliary Heat Exchangers
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (October,2011)
Related Chapters
Section VIII: Division 2–Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
Pressure Testing
Process Piping: The Complete Guide to ASME B31.3, Third Edition
Section III: Subsections NC and ND—Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition