Ultrasonic inline inspection (ILI) tools have been used in the oil and gas pipeline industry for the last 14 years to detect and measure cracks. The detection capabilities of these tools have been verified through many field investigations. ILI ultrasonic crack detection has good correlation with the crack layout on the pipe and estimating the maximum crack depth for the crack or colony. Recent analytical developments have improved the ability to locate individual cracks within a colony and to define the crack depth profile. As with the management of corroding pipelines, the ability to accurately discriminate active from non-active cracks and to determine the rate of crack growth is an essential input into a number of key integrity management decisions. For example, in order to identify the need for and timing of field investigations and/or repairs and to optimize re-inspection intervals crack growth rates are a key input. With increasing numbers of cracks and crack colonies being found in pipelines there is a real need for reliable crack growth information to use in prioritizing remediation activities and planning re-inspection intervals. So as more and more pipelines containing cracks are now being inspected for a second time (or even third time in some cases), the industry is starting to look for quantitative crack growth information from the comparison of repeat ultrasonic crack detection ILI runs. This paper describes the processes used to analyze repeat ultrasonic crack detection ILI data and crack growth information that can be obtained. Discussions on how technical improvements made to crack sizing accuracy and how field verification information can benefit integrity plans are also included.
Skip Nav Destination
2010 8th International Pipeline Conference
September 27–October 1, 2010
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- International Petroleum Technology Institute and the Pipeline Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4420-5
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Comparison of Multiple Crack Detection In-Line Inspection Data to Assess Crack Growth Available to Purchase
Mark Slaughter,
Mark Slaughter
PII Pipeline Solutions, Houston, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
Kevin Spencer,
Kevin Spencer
PII Pipeline Solutions, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Jane Dawson,
Jane Dawson
PII Pipeline Solutions, Cramlington, Northumberland, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Petra Senf
Petra Senf
PII Pipeline Solutions, Stutensee, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Slaughter
PII Pipeline Solutions, Houston, TX
Kevin Spencer
PII Pipeline Solutions, Calgary, AB, Canada
Jane Dawson
PII Pipeline Solutions, Cramlington, Northumberland, UK
Petra Senf
PII Pipeline Solutions, Stutensee, Germany
Paper No:
IPC2010-31255, pp. 397-406; 10 pages
Published Online:
April 4, 2011
Citation
Slaughter, M, Spencer, K, Dawson, J, & Senf, P. "Comparison of Multiple Crack Detection In-Line Inspection Data to Assess Crack Growth." Proceedings of the 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference. 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 27–October 1, 2010. pp. 397-406. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31255
Download citation file:
21
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Small Diameter Remote Field Eddy Current Inspection for Unpiggable Pipelines
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2005)
Gas Coupled Ultrasonic Measurement of Pipeline Wall Thickness
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2005)
Ultrasonic Interface Wave for Interlaminar Crack Detection in Steel–Titanium Composite Pipe
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2019)
Related Chapters
Inspection and Maintenance of Ageing Concrete Oil and Gas Structures on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Introduction
Computer Vision for Structural Dynamics and Health Monitoring
DEVELOPMENTS IN STRAIN-BASED FRACTURE ASSESSMENTS - A PERSPECTIVE
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)