Implementation of Integrity Management Programs (IMP) for pipelines has motivated the design of Fitness-For-Service methodologies to assess Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) and fatigue-dependent features reported by Ultrasonic Crack Detection (UTCD) In-Line Inspections. The philosophical approach defined by the API 579 [1] “Fitness-For-Service” from the petrochemical industry in conjunction with Risk-based standards and regulations (i.e. CSA-Z662-2003 [2] and US DOT 49 Parts 192 [3] and 195 [4]) and in-line inspection validation (i.e. API 1163 [5]) approaches from the pipeline industry have provided the engineering basis for ensuring the safety, reliability and continued service of the in-line inspected pipelines. This paper provides a methodology to develop short and long-term excavation and re-inspection programs through a four (4) phase-process: Pre-Assessment, Integrity Criticality Assessment, Remediation and Repair, Remaining Life Extension and In-Service Monitoring. In the first phase, Pre-assessment, areas susceptible to Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) and fatigue-dependent features are correlated to in-line inspection data, soil modeling, pipeline and operating conditions, and associated consequences in order to provide a risk-based prioritization of pipeline segments and technical understanding for performing the assessment. The second phase, Integrity Criticality Assessment, will develop a short-term maintenance program based on the remaining strength of the in-line inspection reported features previously correlated, overlaid and risk-ranked. In addition, sites may be identified in Phase 1 for further investigation. In the third phase, a Remediation and Repair program will undertake the field investigation in order to repair and mitigate the potential threats as well as validating the in-line inspection results and characterization made during the Pre-assessment and Integrity Criticality Assessment (Phases 1 & 2). With the acquired knowledge from the previous three (3) phases, a Remaining Life Extension and In-Service Monitoring program will be developed to outline the long-term excavation and re-inspection program through the use of SCC and Fatigue crack growth probabilistic modeling and cost benefit analysis. The support of multiple Canadian and US pipeline operating companies in the development, validation and implementation of this methodology made this contribution possible.
Skip Nav Destination
2006 International Pipeline Conference
September 25–29, 2006
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4262-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Methodology to Develop Fitness-for-Service Assessments for Crack Detection In-Line Inspection Data
David Shanks,
David Shanks
CC Technologies Canada, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Rob Leeson,
Rob Leeson
Suncor Energy Canadian Pipeline Limited Partnership, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Corina Blaga,
Corina Blaga
American Innovations, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Rafael G. Mora
Rafael G. Mora
KinderMorgan Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
David Shanks
CC Technologies Canada, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Rob Leeson
Suncor Energy Canadian Pipeline Limited Partnership, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Corina Blaga
American Innovations, Calgary, AB, Canada
Rafael G. Mora
KinderMorgan Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada
Paper No:
IPC2006-10537, pp. 825-830; 6 pages
Published Online:
October 2, 2008
Citation
Shanks, D, Leeson, R, Blaga, C, & Mora, RG. "Methodology to Develop Fitness-for-Service Assessments for Crack Detection In-Line Inspection Data." Proceedings of the 2006 International Pipeline Conference. Volume 2: Integrity Management; Poster Session; Student Paper Competition. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 25–29, 2006. pp. 825-830. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2006-10537
Download citation file:
6
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Implications of Inspection Updating on System Fatigue Reliability of Offshore Structures
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2000)
Facility Integrity Management and Assessment of Associated Risk Conditions
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2016)
PVRC Division on Continued Operation of Equipment
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2000)
Related Chapters
DYNAMIC GEOHAZARD MANAGEMENT IN CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Global Harmonization of Flaw Modeling/Characterization
Global Applications of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code
Overview of Section XI Stipulations
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition