Hydrostatic testing is one way to demonstrate the integrity of a pipeline that may contain stress-corrosion cracks. In order to establish appropriate intervals for such tests, it is necessary to make a reasonable assumption about the probable maximum growth rate of cracks that might exist in the pipeline. Although growth rates have been measured in laboratory experiments, those rates are not meaningful for a buried pipeline, because the growth rate depends upon many unknown factors, such as the condition of the coating, the composition of any liquid in contact with the pipe, the susceptibility of the steel, and the temperature. However, it is possible to infer what a probable maximum growth rate is, from the hydrostatic-test history of a portion of a pipeline. This paper describes a method for establishing hydrostatic-test intervals based upon the assumption that cracks that already led to a service failure or hydrostatic-test failure had a higher growth rate than surviving cracks. That assumption is reasonable, because the cracking conditions at the failed cracks must have been more severe than the conditions around any surviving or future crack. The method does not require any knowledge about the nature of the chemical environment at the surface of the pipe, the susceptibility of the steel, or whether the cracks are high-pH stress-corrosion cracks or near-neutral-pH stress-corrosion cracks. The only data that are required are probable maximum values for the actual yield strength and the actual ultimate tensile strength, which usually can be determined from mill records. Using this method, it can be shown that the interval lengths are strongly affected by the test pressure. It also can be shown that uniform test intervals are less effective than graduated intervals. In fact, subsequent intervals may be longer than previous ones, even if hydrotest failures occurred in the previous tests. The validity of this method was demonstrated by applying it, in principle, to actual historical data from over a dozen valve sections that have been subjected to multiple hydrostatic tests and showing that, if this method had been used, more failures would have been prevented with fewer tests.
Skip Nav Destination
2006 International Pipeline Conference
September 25–29, 2006
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4262-2
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Method for Establishing Hydrostatic Re-Test Intervals for Pipelines With Stress-Corrosion Cracking Available to Purchase
Raymond R. Fessler,
Raymond R. Fessler
BIZTEK Consulting, Inc., Evanston, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
Steve Rapp
Steve Rapp
Duke Energy Gas Transmission, Houston, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
Raymond R. Fessler
BIZTEK Consulting, Inc., Evanston, IL
Steve Rapp
Duke Energy Gas Transmission, Houston, TX
Paper No:
IPC2006-10163, pp. 259-263; 5 pages
Published Online:
October 2, 2008
Citation
Fessler, RR, & Rapp, S. "Method for Establishing Hydrostatic Re-Test Intervals for Pipelines With Stress-Corrosion Cracking." Proceedings of the 2006 International Pipeline Conference. Volume 2: Integrity Management; Poster Session; Student Paper Competition. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 25–29, 2006. pp. 259-263. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2006-10163
Download citation file:
26
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Mechanisms of High-pH and Near-Neutral-pH SCC of Underground Pipelines
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2001)
Thermal Damage, Cracking and Rapid Erosion of Cannon Bore Coatings
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2003)
Critical Review and Appraisal of Traditional and New Procedures for the Quantification of Creep Fracture Behavior Using 1Cr–1Mo–0.25V Steel
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2009)
Related Chapters
Section VIII: Division 2–Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
Compromise between Tensile and Fatigue Strength
New Advanced High Strength Steels: Optimizing Properties
Final Report
Applications Guide for Determining the Yield Strength of In-Service Pipe by Hardness Evaluation: Final Report