The use of a mechanical electrical connection to a pipeline is tested to determine its’ viability. Historically, the installation of a cadweld on pipelines has been the method generally accepted for attaching an electrical connection to pipe. Cadwelds are usually serviceable. In the case of accommodating up to 800 amperes of current, up to 3 CAD welds have been used. In addition, there is a general feeling in the pipeline industry to avoid cadwelds, if possible, because they can create a heat affected zone and the possibility of cracking. Where pipelines traverse or parallel high voltage transmission lines, there exists the possibility of voltage and current induction when phase imbalance occurs. These current flows can approach 800 amps. If a cadweld is the main conduct at the pipe surface, burns, high heat, or connection malfunction can occur. This paper describes the testing undertaken to determine if a PetroSleeve installation could be used as a mechanical electrical connection suitable for conducting up to 800 amperes of current. Following the initial testing, three sleeves were installed on operating pipelines for AC Mitigation.
Skip Nav Destination
2006 International Pipeline Conference
September 25–29, 2006
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
0-7918-4261-4
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Testing to Determine Whether a PetroSleeve Can be Used for an Electrical Connection to a Pipe for AC Mitigation Available to Purchase
Robert J. Smyth,
Robert J. Smyth
PetroSleeve Inc., Nisku, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
L. E. Cermak
L. E. Cermak
Keyera Energy, Rocky Mountain House, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert J. Smyth
PetroSleeve Inc., Nisku, AB, Canada
L. E. Cermak
Keyera Energy, Rocky Mountain House, AB, Canada
Paper No:
IPC2006-10030, pp. 83-89; 7 pages
Published Online:
October 2, 2008
Citation
Smyth, RJ, & Cermak, LE. "Testing to Determine Whether a PetroSleeve Can be Used for an Electrical Connection to a Pipe for AC Mitigation." Proceedings of the 2006 International Pipeline Conference. Volume 1: Project Management; Design and Construction; Environmental Issues; GIS/Database Development; Innovative Projects and Emerging Issues; Operations and Maintenance; Pipelining in Northern Environments; Standards and Regulations. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 25–29, 2006. pp. 83-89. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2006-10030
Download citation file:
8
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
A Computational Temperature Analysis for Induction Heating of Welded Pipes
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,1985)
Improvement of Residual Stresses of Circumferential Joint of Pipe by Heat-Sink Welding
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,1986)
The Impact of Weld Metal Creep Strength on the Overall Creep Strength of 9% Cr Steel Weldments
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2011)
Related Chapters
DEVELOPMENTS IN STRAIN-BASED FRACTURE ASSESSMENTS - A PERSPECTIVE
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Experimental Study on Hydrogen Induced Cracking in Deformed and Heat Treated Armco Pure Iron
International Hydrogen Conference (IHC 2016): Materials Performance in Hydrogen Environments
Defect Assessment
Pipeline Integrity Assurance: A Practical Approach