US pipeline integrity management regulations require operators to rank the risks caused by their operations. Many operators use qualitative methods for this risk ranking process. Such methods have several benefits including simplicity and flexibility. Unfortunately, they rely heavily on engineering judgment and produce results that are very specific to the pipeline system(s) being ranked. This makes it extremely difficult to relate the outputs from different systems or companies within an organization. This paper describes the development and application of a risk ranking approach that requires less judgment and provides the user with an estimate of the true risk of operating the pipeline. Quantitative methods, based on an understanding of structural mechanics, are applied to seven of the nine threat categories listed in ASME B31.8S in order to determine the pipeline’s reliability. An assessment of risk to life is achieved by combining the output from structural mechanics models with a quantitative consequence of failure model. The software operates on a GIS platform, making it easier to demonstrate compliance with the integrity data management requirements that are now part of the relevant federal codes. Results produced from the quantitative approach have been compared to those generated by qualitative methods, in a case study. This illustrates some important differences between the two and show that a more rigorous, quantitative approach can provide the operator with significant benefits including the ability to generate meaningful results with less data. In particular, quantitative methods have the potential to allow operators to move towards a more performance-based approach to their ongoing integrity management processes.
Skip Nav Destination
2004 International Pipeline Conference
October 4–8, 2004
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- International Petroleum Technology Institute
ISBN:
0-7918-4176-6
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Development of a Risk Ranking Tool Based on Quantitative Methods Available to Purchase
Ray Hicks,
Ray Hicks
Advantica Ltd., Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Clive Ward
Clive Ward
Advantica Ltd., Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Ray Hicks
Advantica Ltd., Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
Clive Ward
Advantica Ltd., Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
Paper No:
IPC2004-0549, pp. 2577-2586; 10 pages
Published Online:
December 4, 2008
Citation
Hicks, R, & Ward, C. "Development of a Risk Ranking Tool Based on Quantitative Methods." Proceedings of the 2004 International Pipeline Conference. 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. October 4–8, 2004. pp. 2577-2586. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2004-0549
Download citation file:
16
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Call for papers: Third ASRANet-2006, International Colloquium: Integration of Structural Analysis, Risk, and Reliability.
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (May,2005)
Pacific Ocean Windspeeds Prediction by Gaidai Multivariate Risks Evaluation Method, Utilizing Self-Deconvolution
ASME Open J. Engineering (January,2024)
Gaidai Risk Evaluation Method for Lifetime Assessment for Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Gearbox
ASME J Nondestructive Evaluation (May,2025)
Related Chapters
Pipeline Integrity Management and Risk Assessment Introduction
Asset Integrity Management of Critical Infrastructure
USE OF A GEOHAZARD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO REDUCE PIPELINE FAILURE RATES
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Integrity Technical Support
Pipeline Integrity Assurance: A Practical Approach