The paper describes which aspects of tool accuracy are important for the choice of ILI tools and design of new ones. It is discussed what constitutes an inspection run comparison. What kind of work is carried out, especially if several ILI vendors are involved? What kind of integrity statement can be deduced and how is this influenced by tool accuracy? Finally, the paper will discuss how some aspects of fracture mechanics affect the design of crack detection pigs. What are the minimum requirements for an ILI tool to allow for reasonable defect assessment? In addition, relation between companies performing In-Line Inspection (ILI) and those providing defect assessment is discussed. To what degree should an inspection company also deal with issues of pipeline integrity?
Skip Nav Destination
2002 4th International Pipeline Conference
September 29–October 3, 2002
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3620-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
How Do Defect Assessment Methods Influence the Choice and Construction of In-Line Inspection Tools
Konrad Reber,
Konrad Reber
NDT Systems & Services AG, Stutensee, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Beller,
Michael Beller
NDT Systems & Services AG, Stutensee, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Neb I. Uzelac
Neb I. Uzelac
Neb Uzelac Consulting, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Konrad Reber
NDT Systems & Services AG, Stutensee, Germany
Michael Beller
NDT Systems & Services AG, Stutensee, Germany
Neb I. Uzelac
Neb Uzelac Consulting, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
Paper No:
IPC2002-27391, pp. 2039-2044; 6 pages
Published Online:
February 24, 2009
Citation
Reber, K, Beller, M, & Uzelac, NI. "How Do Defect Assessment Methods Influence the Choice and Construction of In-Line Inspection Tools." Proceedings of the 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference. 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 29–October 3, 2002. pp. 2039-2044. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27391
Download citation file:
7
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Gas Turbine Progress through Trouble
Mechanical Engineering (February,2011)
Risk-Based Considerations in Developing Strategies to Ensure Pipeline
Integrity—Part I: Theory
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,1994)
A Bayesian Model for the Probability Distribution of Fatigue Damage in Tubular Joints
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2004)
Related Chapters
LARGE STANDOFF MAGNETOMETRY TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES TO ASSESS PIPELINE INTEGRITY UNDER GEOHAZARD CONDITIONS AND APPROACHES TO UTILISATION OF IT
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
DYNAMIC GEOHAZARD MANAGEMENT IN CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Use of Large Standoff Magnetometry for Geohazard Pipeline Integrity Investigations
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)