TransCanada owns and operates over 38,000 km of pipeline throughout North America, which cross over 3,300 slopes and 1,200 watercourses. Ground movements on slopes at river crossings are an important pipeline hazard across Canada and especially within the Alberta system. These movements have led to several past pipeline ruptures and the development of a relatively extensive slope monitoring program. Historically, ground movement impacts are an industry-wide problem. The results of a 1998 study by the Gas Research Institute reported that external force damage from natural forces, including ground movement, was responsible for approximately 12 percent of all incidents reported on U.S. onshore pipelines between 1985 and 1994. Of all natural force incidents, ground movement accounted for approximately 29 percent of the total, on average. Furthermore, of all fires or explosions resulting from pipeline incidents, ground movements were reported responsible for about 5 percent of the total. In a similar study of Alberta pipeline failures and incidents between 1980 and 1997 (EUB, 1998), ground movement was the cause of 56 ruptures, or 3.5 percent of the total. Until recently, monitoring of the progress of slope movements was reactive and undertaken in a traditional fashion, using primarily slope inclinometers and/or ground surveys. Recently, however, TransCanada has adopted a proactive approach for the management of ground movements. Consistent with the management of other pipeline hazards, such as corrosion, ground movements are cast in a risk-based framework. The application of DInSAR technology, Differential Interferometry applied to satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, fits well within the proactive approach and has proven successful in measuring ground movements on ROW slopes to sub-centimetre accuracy. In 2000, a Pipeline Research Committee International (PRCI) study was carried out on a TransCanada Right of Way (RoW) that compared conventional slope indicator readings with DInSAR technology and proved the capability of the technology. TransCanada has begun to use DInSAR technology in this program of monitoring Alberta slopes. Typically, TransCanada monitors slope movements at 53 sites with frequency of readings between bi-annually and 4 times per year using conventional methods. Since 2001, 14 slopes on the TransCanada system have been instrumented using DInSAR methods and monitoring of movements using interferometric methods is continuing.
Skip Nav Destination
2002 4th International Pipeline Conference
September 29–October 3, 2002
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Conference Sponsors:
- Pipeline Division
ISBN:
0-7918-3620-7
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Satellite-Based Monitoring of Slope Movements on TransCanada’s Pipeline System Available to Purchase
Gregg O’Neil,
Gregg O’Neil
Visitless Integrity Assessment, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Alan Samchek
Alan Samchek
TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregg O’Neil
Visitless Integrity Assessment, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Alan Samchek
TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada
Paper No:
IPC2002-27356, pp. 2017-2029; 13 pages
Published Online:
February 24, 2009
Citation
O’Neil, G, & Samchek, A. "Satellite-Based Monitoring of Slope Movements on TransCanada’s Pipeline System." Proceedings of the 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference. 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 29–October 3, 2002. pp. 2017-2029. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27356
Download citation file:
11
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Fire and Explosion Risks and Consequences in Electrical Substations—A Transformer Case Study
ASME Open J. Engineering (January,2022)
Risk Analysis for the Urban Buried Gas Pipeline With Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2012)
Forensic Examination and Failure Analysis of a 220-MVA Step-Up Transformer Fire
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (December,2016)
Related Chapters
Pipeline Integrity and Security
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Pipeline Integrity
Pipeline Design & Construction: A Practical Approach, Third Edition